Re: online configuration manuals messed up?

2009-03-04 Thread Amos Jeffries
> Browsing through >http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.7/cfgman/ > and the 2.6 manual, it seems like the argument types for all config > directives are missing... has something changed? > > > -- > Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com > I don't think the argument types have ever been

online configuration manuals messed up?

2009-03-04 Thread Mark Nottingham
Browsing through http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.7/cfgman/ and the 2.6 manual, it seems like the argument types for all config directives are missing... has something changed? -- Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com

Re: SBuf review at r9370

2009-03-04 Thread Amos Jeffries
* Remove isImported. Copy and then free the buffer when importing instead. Same motivation as in the isLiteral comment above. >>> This too has a IMO a very practical use: it allows us an easy path to >>> get into the SBuf world i/o buffer which have been created by the i/o >>> layer.

Re: SBuf review at r9370

2009-03-04 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 03/04/2009 06:09 AM, Kinkie wrote: > Who'd be in charge of managing the passed memory block? > I see two choices: > - the caller is in charge > then absorb becomes an alias of assign() and has no reason to exist > except create confusion > - absorb frees > this would make the behaviour more

Re: SBuf review at r9370

2009-03-04 Thread Kinkie
>>> * Remove isImported. Copy and then free the buffer when importing >>> instead. Same motivation as in the isLiteral comment above. >>> >> This too has a IMO a very practical use: it allows us an easy path to >> get into the SBuf world i/o buffer which have been created by the i/o >> layer. If yo