Re: trunk ipv6 split-stack configure test issues

Henrik Nordström wrote: fre 2010-05-14 klockan 18:20 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries: The problem is that the flag IPV6_V6ONLY is a standard define. It's present on all IPv6 systems. The only way to identify the stack operation, is to use it and see what error comes back. Is there stacks having t

Re: DNS & IPv6

One more nail: The retry counter is currently broken in the ->A switch, resulting in , , , AA, giveup. And this regardless of how many name servers you have configured. If you have 2 nameservers either one of them are broken always returning server failure then the chances for the A

DNS & IPv6

As you may have noticed I have been looking at the IPv6 support in the last days, and now I am looking at how we perform DNS queries. Today we first do an query, followed by an A query. As we anyway do both queries it would be better if we ran both in parallell. The benefits of this is twofol

Re: trunk ipv6 split-stack configure test issues

fre 2010-05-14 klockan 18:20 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries: > The problem is that the flag IPV6_V6ONLY is a standard define. It's > present on all IPv6 systems. The only way to identify the stack > operation, is to use it and see what error comes back. Is there stacks having this define but not al

Hudson build is back to normal: 3.HEAD-amd64-CentOS-5.3 #532

See

Re: [MERGE] [3.1] Fall back on IPv4 if IPv6 is not present

fre 2010-05-14 klockan 18:11 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries: > Henrik Nordström wrote: > > fre 2010-05-14 klockan 16:47 +1200 skrev Robert Collins: > >> +1 > > > > Applied. > > > > > > I can't seem to get tcp_outgoing_address to failover cleanly or mark the > v6 address bad with this one when there

Re: [MERGE] [3.1] Fall back on IPv4 if IPv6 is not present

fre 2010-05-14 klockan 18:11 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries: > I can't seem to get tcp_outgoing_address to failover cleanly or mark the > v6 address bad with this one when there is no v6 link on the box. What did you have tcp_outgoing_address set to? And what kind of failover are you expecting? This

Re: [MERGE] [3.1] Fall back on IPv4 if IPv6 is not present

fre 2010-05-14 klockan 18:11 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries: > I can't seem to get tcp_outgoing_address to failover cleanly or mark the > v6 address bad with this one when there is no v6 link on the box. If you have no IPv6 stack at all then it will query for records, but silently skip them. >