Re: trunk ipv6 split-stack configure test issues

lör 2010-05-15 klockan 17:56 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries: But that leaves us without support for v6 on MacOSX and OpenBSD, and WindowsXP. Accepting requests should work already in 3.1, but user need to configure two http_port one for ipv6 and one for ipv4. But yes, forwarding would not work

Joining squid-dev List

Hi, I'm following directions at http://www.squid-cache.org/Support/mailing-lists.dyn in joining this list... My main motivation is to submit a patch for the minor changes I made to the squid source described below: We're in the process of implementing squid 3.1.1 version for reverse proxying.

[3.1] drop split-stack and V6ONLY magics

lör 2010-05-15 klockan 10:42 +0200 skrev Henrik Nordström: But I honestly do not see why we need to configure run test for any of this, other than that we can compile. A Squid compiled with IPv6 support will now run just fine even if the IPv6 stack is not there at runtime, and the only use of

Re: [3.1] drop split-stack and V6ONLY magics

Henrik Nordström wrote: lör 2010-05-15 klockan 10:42 +0200 skrev Henrik Nordström: But I honestly do not see why we need to configure run test for any of this, other than that we can compile. A Squid compiled with IPv6 support will now run just fine even if the IPv6 stack is not there at

Re: Joining squid-dev List

senad.ci...@thomsonreuters.com wrote: Hi, I'm following directions at http://www.squid-cache.org/Support/mailing-lists.dyn in joining this list... My main motivation is to submit a patch for the minor changes I made to the squid source described below: We're in the process of implementing

Re: [3.1] drop split-stack and V6ONLY magics

lör 2010-05-15 klockan 22:47 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries: I think we should retain a test for existence of IPV6_V6ONLY though. It can be a if-compiles and will catch the WindowsXP etc cases. Why? If IPV6_ONLY is there then the code will always request it to be disabled. The .cc/.h changes

Re: [3.1] drop split-stack and V6ONLY magics

And corrected version.. was an unrelated configure.in change which did not belong here. lör 2010-05-15 klockan 23:22 +0200 skrev Henrik Nordström: lör 2010-05-15 klockan 22:47 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries: I think we should retain a test for existence of IPV6_V6ONLY though. It can be a

Re: [3.1] drop split-stack and V6ONLY magics

Henrik Nordström wrote: lör 2010-05-15 klockan 22:47 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries: I think we should retain a test for existence of IPV6_V6ONLY though. It can be a if-compiles and will catch the WindowsXP etc cases. Why? If IPV6_ONLY is there then the code will always request it to be disabled.