Re: Joining squid-dev List

2010-05-18 Thread Mark Nottingham
Well, refreshCheckHTCP() is called when a peer receives a HTCP request, rather than when the HTCP response is evaluated on the sending peer. RFC2756 defines the semantics as >RESPONSE codes for TST are as follows: > >0 entity is present in responder's cache >1 entity is not pre

Re: [MERGE] Squid Patch (revision 10487)

2010-05-18 Thread Amos Jeffries
On Tue, 18 May 2010 16:25:31 -0500, wrote: > Attached file is generated patch for the issue where squid does not > contact its siblings for the stale resources. New directive has been > added to make this behavior optional. > > Let me know if any issues. Something has gone wrong in the patch cre

[RFC] squid purge tool

2010-05-18 Thread Amos Jeffries
On Tue, 18 May 2010 21:07:41 +0200, Henrik Nordström wrote: > tis 2010-05-18 klockan 21:50 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries: > >> >> It's a third-party app still. >> >> http://www.wa.apana.org.au/~dean/squidpurge/ >> >> or >> > >> > Thanks for this tool amos, but this is an old one >> > compilation bre

Re: [MERGE] [3.1] Clean up commReset use in combination with tproxy or tcp_outgoing_address

2010-05-18 Thread Amos Jeffries
On Tue, 18 May 2010 21:42:00 +0200, Henrik Nordström wrote: > tis 2010-05-18 klockan 20:54 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries: >> These fixes are not really undoing the bug 222 fix are they? mroe >> replacing it with a better fix AIUI. >> >> Can we close Bug again now? > > I suppose so. > > But ne

Re: Joining squid-dev List

2010-05-18 Thread Henrik Nordström
tis 2010-05-18 klockan 22:59 +1000 skrev Mark Nottingham: > Any thoughts about moving where refreshCheck is called for HTCP? Haen't looked at it. What is the problem? Regards Henrik

Re: [MERGE] [3.1] Clean up commReset use in combination with tproxy or tcp_outgoing_address

2010-05-18 Thread Henrik Nordström
tis 2010-05-18 klockan 20:54 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries: > These fixes are not really undoing the bug 222 fix are they? mroe > replacing it with a better fix AIUI. > > Can we close Bug again now? I suppose so. But need to fix DNS before I am happy.. currently the A lookup is heavily penaliz

Re: [3.1] drop split-stack and V6ONLY magics

2010-05-18 Thread Henrik Nordström
tis 2010-05-18 klockan 20:49 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries: > Nevermind sorry. I was overloooking the #ifdef IPV6_V6ONLY in > comm_set_v6only(). > The debugs() in that #else case should be bumped down to something less > annoying now. It _will_ occur on each socket open on WindowsXP and maybe > oth

RE: Joining squid-dev List

2010-05-18 Thread senad.cimic
-Original Message- From: Mark Nottingham [mailto:m...@yahoo-inc.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 12:12 AM To: Cimic, Senad (Legal) Cc: squ...@treenet.co.nz; squid-dev@squid-cache.org Subject: Re: Joining squid-dev List Hi, I'm looking at the same issue in Squid 2.HEAD (fortuitously, on

Re: Joining squid-dev List

2010-05-18 Thread Mark Nottingham
OK. Any thoughts about moving where refreshCheck is called for HTCP? Cheers, On 18/05/2010, at 4:33 PM, Henrik Nordström wrote: > tis 2010-05-18 klockan 15:12 +1000 skrev Mark Nottingham: > >> /* >> * The 'need_validation' flag is used to prevent forwarding >> * loops between

Re: [MERGE] [3.1] Clean up commReset use in combination with tproxy or tcp_outgoing_address

2010-05-18 Thread Amos Jeffries
These fixes are not really undoing the bug 222 fix are they? mroe replacing it with a better fix AIUI. Can we close Bug again now? Amos -- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.3

Re: [3.1] drop split-stack and V6ONLY magics

2010-05-18 Thread Amos Jeffries
Henrik Nordström wrote: sön 2010-05-16 klockan 11:58 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries: By existence I meant check if it is defined. If the macro is not defined it's an --enable-ipv6 fail, same as if PF_INET6 was not defined. Why? It's not critical for IPv6. Regards Henrik Nevermind sorry. I was