This patch forgotten.
I am suggesting:
- apply the patch as is
- With a second patch move the SSL indexes from global.h to support.h
Is it OK?
On 06/10/2013 07:31 PM, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
On 06/10/2013 03:16 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 8/06/2013 4:20 a.m., Tsantilas Christos wrote:
Some customers complaining that their annotations (set by url_rewriter)
look wrong when logged to access.log. Here are a few examples of logged
annotations:
%22-%22
%22Default_Google%22
%22pg13,k12%22
Currently the logging code when needs to log an annotation:
1) first check for
This discussion is also frozen...
Alex and Kinki suggest the function style, and looks that is a good
choice and there are very good reasons for doing this.
Are we OK to implement it like this?
@Alex
What are you suggesting file(location) or parameters(location)?
On 06/04/2013 05:55 PM,
On 18/06/2013 8:21 p.m., Tsantilas Christos wrote:
Some customers complaining that their annotations (set by url_rewriter)
look wrong when logged to access.log. Here are a few examples of logged
annotations:
%22-%22
%22Default_Google%22
%22pg13,k12%22
Where are those %22
On 18/06/2013 7:29 p.m., Tsantilas Christos wrote:
This patch forgotten.
I am suggesting:
- apply the patch as is
- With a second patch move the SSL indexes from global.h to support.h
Is it OK?
Yes that will do.
Amos
On 06/18/2013 12:50 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 18/06/2013 8:21 p.m., Tsantilas Christos wrote:
Some customers complaining that their annotations (set by url_rewriter)
look wrong when logged to access.log. Here are a few examples of logged
annotations:
%22-%22
%22Default_Google%22
On 06/18/2013 12:53 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 18/06/2013 7:29 p.m., Tsantilas Christos wrote:
This patch forgotten.
I am suggesting:
- apply the patch as is
The patch applied to trunk
- With a second patch move the SSL indexes from global.h to support.h
For a stupid reason,
See http://build.squid-cache.org/job/3.HEAD-amd64-FreeBSD-7.2/1891/changes
On 06/18/2013 03:42 AM, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
What are you suggesting file(location) or parameters(location)?
parameters() or options() seems better to me because the code actually
loads a squid.conf directive parameters. It cannot load directives
themselves this way (we have an import
See
http://build.squid-cache.org/job/3.HEAD-amd64-FreeBSD-9.0-clang/276/changes
Changes:
[Christos Tsantilas] Sending root certificate for validation
This patch modify squid cert validation subsystem to sent to cert validator
helper the complete certificates chain, not only the certificates
Done and applied as trunk rev.12915.
Amos
See
http://build.squid-cache.org/job/3.HEAD-amd64-FreeBSD-9.0-clang/277/changes
Changes:
[Amos Jeffries] Add Master Transaction class
... to store and propigate the shared state used end-to-end through Squid
for logging or server-side component input. This excludes Job and Call
pointers, but
12 matches
Mail list logo