On 02/11/2014 03:16 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 2014-02-12 11:07, Henrik Nordström wrote:
But seriously, it's a very small change to Squid. All systemd and the
like needs is that Squid stops all the backgrounding, setsid etc done in
watch_child(). The rest is business as usual, including
tor 2014-02-13 klockan 09:43 -0700 skrev Alex Rousskov:
I am not sure which approach is the best, but I am sure we need to
clearly define and document the new semantics to avoid repeating -N
problems which were caused primarily by folks (including myself)
interpreting what -N means
On 2014-02-14 11:32, Henrik Nordström wrote:
tor 2014-02-13 klockan 09:43 -0700 skrev Alex Rousskov:
I am not sure which approach is the best, but I am sure we need to
clearly define and document the new semantics to avoid repeating -N
problems which were caused primarily by folks (including
On 02/13/2014 03:47 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Use of -N with no parameter produce an error.
I do not think we have to break existing scripts (some of which may
still be working OK!). We can issue a deprecation warning but treat bare
-N as -N foreground or equivalent.
Perhapse making both -N and
On 14 Feb 2014, at 06:31, Alex Rousskov rouss...@measurement-factory.com
wrote:
On 02/13/2014 03:47 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Use of -N with no parameter produce an error.
I do not think we have to break existing scripts (some of which may
still be working OK!). We can issue a deprecation
On 02/13/2014 11:21 PM, Francesco Chemolli wrote:
On 14 Feb 2014, at 06:31, Alex Rousskov rouss...@measurement-factory.com
wrote:
On 02/13/2014 03:47 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Use of -N with no parameter produce an error.
I do not think we have to break existing scripts (some of which
