On 26/11/10 13:51, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 26/11/10 13:08, Henrik Nordström wrote:
tis 2010-11-23 klockan 03:49 + skrev Amos Jeffries:
3.2 and later send HTTP/1.1 version on all regular response lines.
CONNECT seems to have been missed somehow. This corrects the omission so
the hard-coded
On 26/11/10 13:08, Henrik Nordström wrote:
tis 2010-11-23 klockan 03:49 + skrev Amos Jeffries:
3.2 and later send HTTP/1.1 version on all regular response lines.
CONNECT seems to have been missed somehow. This corrects the omission so
the hard-coded CONNECT reply strings send 1.1 as well.
tis 2010-11-23 klockan 03:49 + skrev Amos Jeffries:
> 3.2 and later send HTTP/1.1 version on all regular response lines.
>
> CONNECT seems to have been missed somehow. This corrects the omission so
> the hard-coded CONNECT reply strings send 1.1 as well.
Ouch, is that response hardcoded?
> I
On 11/22/2010 08:49 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
3.2 and later send HTTP/1.1 version on all regular response lines.
CONNECT seems to have been missed somehow. This corrects the omission so
the hard-coded CONNECT reply strings send 1.1 as well.
I'm not certain, but this may explain some of the very
3.2 and later send HTTP/1.1 version on all regular response lines.
CONNECT seems to have been missed somehow. This corrects the omission so
the hard-coded CONNECT reply strings send 1.1 as well.
I'm not certain, but this may explain some of the very rare CONNECT
problems seen in 3.2+.
Alex:
i
