Re: [RFC] Squid process model and the need for -n

2014-01-28 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 11/01/2013 07:11 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: -n - Windows service name The Windows build of Squid requires a -n option to point at the particular named service which is running in the background. Which defaults to the name squid when omitted. Why do we need a command line option to specify

Re: [RFC] Squid process model and the need for -n

2014-01-28 Thread Henrik Nordström
tis 2014-01-28 klockan 11:25 -0700 skrev Alex Rousskov: Why do we need a command line option to specify a service name? Can the service name be configured via squid.conf? The squid.conf location is already configurable via command line, of course. If I remember correctly the service name is

Re: [RFC] Squid process model and the need for -n

2014-01-28 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 01/28/2014 11:56 AM, Henrik Nordström wrote: tis 2014-01-28 klockan 11:25 -0700 skrev Alex Rousskov: Why do we need a command line option to specify a service name? Can the service name be configured via squid.conf? The squid.conf location is already configurable via command line, of

Re: [RFC] Squid process model and the need for -n

2014-01-28 Thread Henrik Nordström
tis 2014-01-28 klockan 12:15 -0700 skrev Alex Rousskov: but squid.conf location is already configurable via the command line. Why another option, that is now propagated to non-Windows builds, without even defining what service is in non-Windows context (AFAIK). If I am not mistaken the