fre 2014-07-25 klockan 19:05 +0300 skrev Eliezer Croitoru:
The response to alex question why would anybody want to drop
cteonnt-length: header:
Some places do not allow cookies or POST for external services and it's
sometimes can looks weird but I still understand why would it be
I do believe that from a run-time point of view (such as speed and cpu
load) there is not much of a difference between using squid acls for
headers and hard-coding a decision.
However I do think that squid users\consumers can vary between
ISPs\enterprises\homes\smbs\others and any default
lör 2014-07-19 klockan 11:35 -0600 skrev Alex Rousskov:
The above email is talking about a nnCoection: close header which
appears to be a result of a bug in some 15-year old software.
Identifying that rare header would be overall harmful -- Squid would
spend more resources on detecting that
On 07/18/2014 11:33 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 19/07/2014 2:07 a.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
This got my eyes but I am not reading all ietf httpbits mails and I
would like to get a reference for this thread please?
There are two type of removable headers:
a) headers which exist purely to
On 07/18/2014 11:37 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 19/07/2014 2:55 a.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 07/18/2014 01:32 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
I have wondered about creating a registry of known garbage and simply
dropping those headers on arrival in the parser. This would be in
addition to the
Some of the statisticas being brought up in the IETF HTTP/2 discussions
is highlighting certain garbage headers which are unfortunately quite
common.
I have wondered about creating a registry of known garbage and simply
dropping those headers on arrival in the parser. This would be in
addition to
This got my eyes but I am not reading all ietf httpbits mails and I
would like to get a reference for this thread please?
Thanks,
Eliezer
On 07/18/2014 10:32 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Some of the statisticas being brought up in the IETF HTTP/2 discussions
is highlighting certain garbage
On 07/18/2014 01:32 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Some of the statisticas being brought up in the IETF HTTP/2 discussions
is highlighting certain garbage headers which are unfortunately quite
common.
I join Eliezer in begging for pointers to relevant posts or pages.
I have wondered about
On 19/07/2014 2:55 a.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 07/18/2014 01:32 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Some of the statisticas being brought up in the IETF HTTP/2 discussions
is highlighting certain garbage headers which are unfortunately quite
common.
I join Eliezer in begging for pointers to relevant
