fre 2013-01-11 klockan 18:53 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries:
Can anyone present any actually useful reason to keep it despite the
problems it presents?
referse proxies need to be able to cache error responses even if there
is no cache-control. But it does not need to be a specific directive.
The negative_ttl directive is continuously causing problems. What it
does is DoS all clients of a proxy when one of them has a URL problem.
In modern websites which can present per-client error responses targeted
at an individual client this can be a major problem.
I propose dropping the
Hi all,
since we have it already what about taking a softer stance? For
instance, subject it to an hard-coded maximum limit of a few
seconds/minutes, or display a strong warning to cache.log when a value
above a certain time limit is found during parsing..
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Amos
