Re: Answers to questions raised on IRC

2012-10-11 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 10/11/2012 03:03 AM, Kinkie wrote: >> To avoid misunderstanding, I am pretty sure this is a relatively new >> problem, but I have no idea which change(s) broke the build. A few bugs >> may have been fixed since my earlier tests, and the remaining bugs may >> not be related to your changes. > >

Re: Answers to questions raised on IRC

2012-10-11 Thread Kinkie
> To avoid misunderstanding, I am pretty sure this is a relatively new > problem, but I have no idea which change(s) broke the build. A few bugs > may have been fixed since my earlier tests, and the remaining bugs may > not be related to your changes. Hi, it doesn't seem related to my changes, b

Re: Answers to questions raised on IRC

2012-10-09 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 10.10.2012 04:51, Kinkie wrote: Hi all, a quick summary of questions that were raised while I was offline on IRC. @Amos: kinkie: bit of a blocker problem with mswin branch. It was one of the branches which got left out of the master repo upgrade. I can produce a diff of it against tru

Answers to questions raised on IRC

2012-10-09 Thread Kinkie
Hi all, a quick summary of questions that were raised while I was offline on IRC. @Alex: kinkie, --disable-inline (and, hence, --disable-optimizations) breaks build of many test cases. This is relatively new because I often work with --disable-optimizations and it was not a problem. If your rece