lör 2010-08-28 klockan 14:26 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries:
The author confirmed in bugzilla that he was happy with it being labeled
GPLv2 and changed the COPYING file over before I merged.
http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2905
We seem to have missed some of the GPL references in
Just noticed the external_acl/eDirectory_userip is licensed by GPLv3 or
later. This is inconsistent with the rest of the code which is GPLv2 or
later, and is also what we announce as main license for the distribution
as a whole. I see a risk here that the eDirectory_userip gets mislabeled
as
Henrik Nordström wrote:
Just noticed the external_acl/eDirectory_userip is licensed by GPLv3 or
later. This is inconsistent with the rest of the code which is GPLv2 or
later, and is also what we announce as main license for the distribution
as a whole. I see a risk here that the
