On 2-HEAD.
On 14/05/2009, at 6:36 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
On 23/04/2009, at 10:38 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2643
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2631
These are the last two remaining. There's been some discussion on
On 23/04/2009, at 10:38 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2643
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2631
These are the last two remaining. There's been some discussion on
them, but I believe the issues have been resolved in the most
tor 2009-04-23 klockan 13:22 +1000 skrev Mark Nottingham:
OK. Henrik?
FWIW, I think this is the right way to do it -- a flag saying that
monitoring should be direct is backwards-compatible, easy for users to
understand, and addresses the use case.
Almost. The flag should make the
On 21/04/2009, at 10:44 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2642
Seems uncontroversial, applying.
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2643
Amos, any thoughts about the revised patch (monitor-direct)?
On 21/04/2009, at 10:44 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
snip
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2643
Amos, any thoughts about the revised patch (monitor-direct)?
I still don't agree that this is anything close to the Right Way to do it.
Easy, yes, but thats all. Please hold off
On 23/04/2009, at 2:11 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 21/04/2009, at 10:44 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
snip
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2643
Amos, any thoughts about the revised patch (monitor-direct)?
I still don't agree that this is anything close to the Right Way
Mark Nottingham wrote:
Unless I hear otherwise, I'm going to apply the patches attached to the
following bugs:
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2631
response in bugzilla.
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2632
IMO, this should be number of times squid tries
Responses inline, and a couple more:
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2642
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2643
On 20/04/2009, at 4:46 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Mark Nottingham wrote:
Unless I hear otherwise, I'm going to apply the patches attached to
the
Responses inline, and a couple more:
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2642
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2643
On 20/04/2009, at 4:46 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Mark Nottingham wrote:
Unless I hear otherwise, I'm going to apply the patches attached to
the
Responses inline, and a couple more:
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2642
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2643
On 20/04/2009, at 4:46 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Mark Nottingham wrote:
Unless I hear otherwise, I'm going to apply the patches attached to
the
Yeah, this came up in another bug as well, don't remember where, but
really this whole section needs to be reworked pretty extensively;
this is just a way to fine-tune the current behaviour until we figure
out what the right thing to do should be (and I suspect that's not a
trivial task).
Responses inline, and a couple more:
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2642
I can't tell from the patch which one is being remove.
+1 if its the one directly in mainReconfigure()
peerMonitorInit() should probably check for duplicate calls somehow too.
But this is good for a
On 21/04/2009, at 1:24 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Responses inline, and a couple more:
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2642
I can't tell from the patch which one is being remove.
+1 if its the one directly in mainReconfigure()
Yep.
peerMonitorInit() should probably
Yeah, this came up in another bug as well, don't remember where, but
really this whole section needs to be reworked pretty extensively;
this is just a way to fine-tune the current behaviour until we figure
out what the right thing to do should be (and I suspect that's not a
trivial task).
Unless I hear otherwise, I'm going to apply the patches attached to
the following bugs:
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2631
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2632
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2515
--
Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com
15 matches
Mail list logo