On 2014-05-13 11:53, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 13/05/2014 10:52 p.m., Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 13/05/2014 4:56 a.m., Michael Pye wrote:
On 2014-05-12 16:52, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Here is the guts of the original patch as should be relevant to
Squid-3.5 (or 3.4).
http://master.squid-cache.org/~amos
On 2014-05-13 11:53, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 13/05/2014 10:52 p.m., Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 13/05/2014 4:56 a.m., Michael Pye wrote:
On 2014-05-12 16:52, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Here is the guts of the original patch as should be relevant to
Squid-3.5 (or 3.4).
http://master.squid-cache.org/~amos
On 13/05/2014 10:52 p.m., Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 13/05/2014 4:56 a.m., Michael Pye wrote:
>> On 2014-05-12 16:52, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>>> Here is the guts of the original patch as should be relevant to
>>> Squid-3.5 (or 3.4).
>>> http://master.squid-cache.org/~amosjeffries/patches/Pye_s35.patch
On 13/05/2014 4:56 a.m., Michael Pye wrote:
> On 2014-05-12 16:52, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> Here is the guts of the original patch as should be relevant to
>> Squid-3.5 (or 3.4).
>> http://master.squid-cache.org/~amosjeffries/patches/Pye_s35.patch
>
> Many thanks Amos, I've just tried this and it d
On 2014-05-12 16:52, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Here is the guts of the original patch as should be relevant to
Squid-3.5 (or 3.4).
http://master.squid-cache.org/~amosjeffries/patches/Pye_s35.patch
Many thanks Amos, I've just tried this and it does indeed query sibling
for stale content as we want.
On 13/05/2014 2:25 a.m., Michael Pye wrote:
> On 2014-05-11 18:40, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> Not as yet. Henrik pointed out a problem that needed testing:
>> http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-dev/201005/0156.html
>>
>> I dont think we send only-if-cached any longer.
>>
>> Can you confirm
On 2014-05-11 18:40, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Not as yet. Henrik pointed out a problem that needed testing:
http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-dev/201005/0156.html
I dont think we send only-if-cached any longer.
Can you confirm that, or answer Henriks question?
Sorry - I can't confirm
On 12/05/2014 4:39 a.m., Michael Pye wrote:> On 24/05/2010 19:17,
senad.cimic wrote:
>> On 05/23/2010 09:52 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>> How about:
>>>
>>> When Squid has a stale cached response available, it will not
>>> query siblings, by default. When this setting is on Squid will
>>> do so, a
On 24/05/2010 19:17, senad.ci...@thomsonreuters.com wrote:
On 05/23/2010 09:52 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
How about:
When Squid has a stale cached response available, it will not
query siblings, by default. When this setting is on Squid will
do so, as long as the cache_peer line for the sibling
senad.ci...@thomsonreuters.com wrote:
Modified patch file is attached. I committed those documentation changes
as well.
-Senad
+1. Looks okay now.
Amos
--
Please be using
Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.3
squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [MERGE] Squid Patch (revision 10487)
On 05/23/2010 09:52 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> How about:
>
> When Squid has a stale cached response available, it will not
> query siblings, by default. When this setting is on Squid will
> do so, as long as the cac
t: Re: [MERGE] Squid Patch (revision 10487)
On 05/23/2010 09:52 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> How about:
>
> When Squid has a stale cached response available, it will not
> query siblings, by default. When this setting is on Squid will
> do so, as long as the cache_peer line for the sib
On 05/23/2010 09:52 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> How about:
>
> When Squid has a stale cached response available, it will not
> query siblings, by default. When this setting is on Squid will
> do so, as long as the cache_peer line for the sibling does not
> have the 'allow-miss' option configured.
How about:
When Squid has a stale cached response available, it will not
query siblings, by default. When this setting is on Squid will
do so, as long as the cache_peer line for the sibling does not
have the 'allow-miss' option configured.
?
On 23/05/2010, at 9:42 AM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> On
On 05/19/2010 08:00 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Minor suggestions for the documentation:
>
> +NAME: access_sibling_when_stale
> +COMMENT: on|off
> +TYPE: onoff
> +DEFAULT: off
> +LOC: Config.onoff.access_sibling_for_stale_resource
> +DOC_START
> + By default, Squid will not contact siblings w
tor 2010-05-20 klockan 12:00 +1000 skrev Mark Nottingham:
> H, is setting the default to on a bad thing?
Probably not, as the code takes care of allow-miss.
related to this the behavior when the sibling rejects the request need
to be verified. This change will make only-if-cached rejections in
s
Minor suggestions for the documentation:
+NAME: access_sibling_when_stale
+COMMENT: on|off
+TYPE: onoff
+DEFAULT: off
+LOC: Config.onoff.access_sibling_for_stale_resource
+DOC_START
+ By default, Squid will not contact siblings when it has
+ a stale cached response available. If on,
characters by default sometimes.
Amos
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Senad
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 6:55 PM
> To: squid-dev@squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [MERGE] Squid Patch (revision 104
tis 2010-05-18 klockan 16:25 -0500 skrev senad.ci...@thomsonreuters.com:
> Attached file is generated patch for the issue where squid does not
> contact its siblings for the stale resources. New directive has been
> added to make this behavior optional.
Corrected patch attached showing only your c
ons 2010-05-19 klockan 10:03 -0500 skrev senad.ci...@thomsonreuters.com:
> Not sure what went wrong, but since changes in each of the 3 files are
> minimal I included differences as attachments (new version for each
> file is on top, old version is on bottom):
Probably got converted from UNIX to D
On Tue, 18 May 2010 16:25:31 -0500,
wrote:
> Attached file is generated patch for the issue where squid does not
> contact its siblings for the stale resources. New directive has been
> added to make this behavior optional.
>
> Let me know if any issues.
Something has gone wrong in the patch cre
21 matches
Mail list logo
