On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Xia Hongtao wrote:
Maybe in my test environment, the response time not effected by fs I/O so much.
I used polygraph 2.6.7, 1000 robots * 0.2 req/sec * 13KB , cacheable=100%,
recurrence=100%.
So the content will always in memory.
What does access.log say about the hits?
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Xia Hongtao wrote:
Dear Henrik Nordstrom:
I had get the final result of comparing three version.In my new test
environment, the response time:
orig 14.227ms no_pipe 13.550ms pipe_patch 13.905ms
What test did you run?
And have you verified the results are
Dear Henrik Nordstrom:
I had get the final result of comparing three version.In my new test
environment, the response time:
orig 14.227ms no_pipe 13.550ms pipe_patch 13.905ms
I have one questions below.
=== 2004-02-17 12:26:00 you wroted :===
On Tue, 17 Feb
