tor 2007-04-12 klockan 20:31 +0200 skrev Guido Serassio:
Here I think that a methodical comparison between 2.6 and 3.0 is needed.
Not so sure. Find it much more important Squid-3 is stable than feature
complete wrt 2.6.
Probably there are a lot of not so big changes missing in 3.0.
Very
tor 2007-04-12 klockan 13:19 -0600 skrev Alex Rousskov:
IMO, if we can support enough directives to accommodate 51% of current
Squid2 users, that is enough.
More importantly, thanks to the new major features of Squid-3 such as a
good ICAP client we might attract new users again, not only
tis 2007-04-10 klockan 21:38 -0600 skrev Alex Rousskov:
Squid 3.1 is whatever comes after a stable 3.0 release. Open to
experimentation. Not currently branched (but could be if needed).
I think it might be wise to branch Squid-3.0 after PRE6, and that the
model currently used for Squid-2 is
Hi Henrik,
At 17.18 05/05/2006, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
For those who have not been on the #squid-dev IRC channel lately I can
tell that the last weeks has been quite interesting.
The most significant news is that Doug Dixon (aka ganso on the IRC) has
volunteered for the role as
For those who have not been on the #squid-dev IRC channel lately I can
tell that the last weeks has been quite interesting.
The most significant news is that Doug Dixon (aka ganso on the IRC) has
volunteered for the role as Squid-3.0.PRE4 release manager. Expect a
message from him shortly
