tor 2012-10-11 klockan 13:30 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries:
Did you mean we should have no cost being part of their program? or
that there is an admin control panel (contact person?) you have
available to do more than I could?
There is no charge to be part of their Open Source program, and
I can try contacting them to reviewe the Squid scan if wanted.
Yes, please.
It'd be super if they could interface with either bzr or jenkins (or
both)
Their model have changed a bit since we last used their service. Instead
of Coverity polling project SCM the project now runs
tor 2012-10-11 klockan 23:23 +0200 skrev Kinkie:
Please once you're done, please share the recipe so I can try to hook
it into Jenkins for CI.
It's quite simple. Basically a normal build but wrapping the make call
in a cov-build tool by them, and then uploading the result written by
their
Squid is a member of the Coiverity Open Source programme, but we have
not been actively using it.
tis 2012-10-09 klockan 00:27 +0400 skrev Dmitry Kurochkin:
Hello.
We are evaluating Coverity tool for static analyzing of Squid code (see
bug 3635 for details [1]). Initial results with
On 11.10.2012 12:08, Henrik Nordström wrote:
Squid is a member of the Coiverity Open Source programme, but we have
not been actively using it.
Mainly because the code they scan, as of a few weeks ago when I
re-checked for Alex, was a years old version of 3.HEAD approx. prior to
3.1 beta
Hello.
We are evaluating Coverity tool for static analyzing of Squid code (see
bug 3635 for details [1]). Initial results with analysis of recent
Squid trunk revisions are ready and now we need to review them. We are
looking for volunteers among Squid developers who can review identified
