Hi Rueben,
At 00.24 02/12/2005, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
Hi,
On 2/11/2005 3:05 a.m., Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
Summary of the opinions regarding a Squid-2.6 release
Full in favor, including performance enhancements:
http://squidwiki.kinkie.it/Squid-2.6
What was the final outcome of the 2.6
Hi Adrian,
At 13.56 02/12/2005, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005, Serassio Guido wrote:
I think it'd be good if a decision was finalised soon, although
given the diverse opinions guess not everyone is going to be happy :(
I agree, we have loosed another month waiting for something
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
What was the final outcome of the 2.6 release suggestions?
The final outcome is what me and Alex wrote in the last messages a month
ago I think.
Making a Squid-2.6 release is currently put on hold as it is expected
Squid-3.0.STABLE is not beyond
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I agree with Henrik here. We need something that works, and works now.
A lot of the proposed 2.6 changes should go into squid-3 rather easily,
including my IO stuff.
Everything except your IO stuff is in squid-3 already to a large extent.
(the SSL code
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 00:35 +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
If Squid-3.0.STABLE is realistic within a not too distant future then
Squid-2.6 is not needed and would in fact hurt Squid in the long run, no
matter how temting the release it may be to myself and others.
If Squid-3.0.STABLE is
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 23:17:12 +0100 (CET)
Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Evgeny Kotsuba wrote:
* UI patches (!) including usage of sound at errors/warnings and
visual
effects at errror/warning ( as sample -
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 14:29:56 +0100 (CET)
Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Evgeny Kotsuba wrote:
In case of detach/daemon mode admin can't see , but still can hear
beeps.
In detached daemon mode there is no console output at all. Only log
file output.
Is
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Evgeny Kotsuba wrote:
So, I will wait to the end of defrozing and next I can offer
* C -C++ patches
Yes.
* UI patches (!) including usage of sound at errors/warnings and visual
effects at errror/warning ( as sample -
No answer yet:
* Duane Wessels
* Robert Collins
I have mixed feelings about 2.6.
On one hand I think 2.5 has lived too long and it looks bad that
we have not incremented the stable branch number for years.
But on the other hand I feel cheated because I remember being scolded
for adding
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 09:40 -0700, Duane Wessels wrote:
As part of that work
we have promised spend time on making squid-3 stable. We still
intend to do that.
Everyone does.
Looking at the current wishlist for 2.6 I think it is too long and
too ambitious. I would rather that people spend
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Duane Wessels wrote:
Looking at the current wishlist for 2.6 I think it is too long and
too ambitious. I would rather that people spend time on squid-3,
but that is perhaps a selfish reason.
The 2.6 presented in the original wishlist in praktice already exists
and
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Duane Wessels wrote:
Looking at the current wishlist for 2.6 I think it is too long and
too ambitious. I would rather that people spend time on squid-3,
but that is perhaps a selfish reason.
As indicated in my earlier message I have not been able to find customers
Summary of the opinions regarding a Squid-2.6 release
Full in favor, including performance enhancements:
* Henrik Nordstrom
* Guido Serassio
* Adrian Chadd
+ Francesco 'Kinkie' Chemolli
+ Reuben Farrelly
In favor, but no clear indication
+ Andrey Shorin
+ Paul Armstrong
Maybe,
Hi Robert,
At 16.27 01/11/2005, Robert Collins wrote:
Put me in here. I think getting 3.0 stable is not so hard, but will
never happen if the focus remains on 2.5/2.6 - 2.6 should only have
security fixes from 3.0.
Probably the release of Squid 2.6 will further delay the release of
Squid
14 matches
Mail list logo
