Re: Testing ssl-bump-server-first with an upstream proxy

2012-11-26 Thread Steve Hill
Not exactly. The upstream destination still requires SSL connectivity to be usable - and the client will be faced with certificate domain does not match errors unless yoru peer is also able to perform server-forst bumping when it gets contacted by your Squid. It looks to me like your peer is r

Re: Testing ssl-bump-server-first with an upstream proxy

2012-11-22 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 23/11/2012 7:15 a.m., Steve Hill wrote: I'm currently testing the SSL bump-server-first functionality in Squid 3.3.0.1-20121122-r12391. I have an upstream proxy with "never-direct allow all" set (the reasons for this are slightly convoluted :). When making a bumped request, Squid bombs w

Testing ssl-bump-server-first with an upstream proxy

2012-11-22 Thread Steve Hill
I'm currently testing the SSL bump-server-first functionality in Squid 3.3.0.1-20121122-r12391. I have an upstream proxy with "never-direct allow all" set (the reasons for this are slightly convoluted :). When making a bumped request, Squid bombs with: 2012/11/22 17:53:57 kid1| assertion fai