Re: VCS for squid3 development?

On Sat, 2007-12-29 at 02:06 +0100, Henrik Nordström wrote: > fre 2007-12-28 klockan 10:42 +1100 skrev Robert Collins: > > On Fri, 2007-12-28 at 08:25 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > I've been following the VCS debate a little. > > > > > > Guys, I'm not an enormous fan of CVS, but what we have wo

Re: VCS for squid3 development?

On Sat, 2007-12-29 at 02:12 +0100, Henrik Nordström wrote: > lör 2007-12-29 klockan 05:24 +1100 skrev Robert Collins: > > Other projects using distributed VCS tools often do not have a dedicated > > development area, preferring to let individuals publish their own > > branches; I had been assuming

Re: VCS for squid3 development?

fre 2007-12-28 klockan 21:05 +0200 skrev Tsantilas Christos: > Normally when I am working I am having a number of copies of a branch in > my computer and I am trying different thinks on these copies. Then I am > extracting patches from these copies and merging the changes in the main > branch-cop

Re: VCS for squid3 development?

lör 2007-12-29 klockan 05:24 +1100 skrev Robert Collins: > Other projects using distributed VCS tools often do not have a dedicated > development area, preferring to let individuals publish their own > branches; I had been assuming something like that - but its a good > question to raise and discus

Re: VCS for squid3 development?

fre 2007-12-28 klockan 10:42 +1100 skrev Robert Collins: > On Fri, 2007-12-28 at 08:25 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > I've been following the VCS debate a little. > > > > Guys, I'm not an enormous fan of CVS, but what we have works > > *badly*. 150 emails when autoconf changes are made for insta

Re: VCS for squid3 development?

Robert Collins wrote: >> What about the sourceforge developers repository? > > Because bzr is natively distributed we don't need to have a dedicated > developers repository like we have with CVS - anyone using bzr will get > their own copy of the repository automatically; they can commit there as

Re: VCS for squid3 development?

OK, this is good, we will have time to learn the new system. Henrik Nordström wrote: > fre 2007-12-28 klockan 16:16 +0200 skrev Tsantilas Christos: >> Hi Robert, >> >> Which are the required steps from developers? >> Will we open our computers a morning and find all our development >> branches i

Re: VCS for squid3 development?

On Fri, 2007-12-28 at 16:16 +0200, Tsantilas Christos wrote: > Hi Robert, > > Which are the required steps from developers? > Will we open our computers a morning and find all our development > branches in the new system :-) ? Probably not. > What about the sourceforge developers repository?

Re: VCS for squid3 development?

On Fri, 2007-12-28 at 18:09 +0100, Guido Serassio wrote: > > Just a stupid question: there is a native client > (not based on Cygwin) for Windows ? Yes. -Rob -- GPG key available at: . signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: VCS for squid3 development?

fre 2007-12-28 klockan 16:16 +0200 skrev Tsantilas Christos: > Hi Robert, > > Which are the required steps from developers? > Will we open our computers a morning and find all our development > branches in the new system :-) ? > > What about the sourceforge developers repository? Will be hosted

Re: VCS for squid3 development?

Hi Robert, Which are the required steps from developers? Will we open our computers a morning and find all our development branches in the new system :-) ? What about the sourceforge developers repository? Will be hosted in the squid main server? Regards, Christos PS. I am only use cvs and

Re: VCS for squid3 development?

On Fri, Dec 28, 2007, Robert Collins wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-12-28 at 08:25 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > I've been following the VCS debate a little. > > > > Guys, I'm not an enormous fan of CVS, but what we have works > > *badly*. 150 emails when autoconf changes are made for instance. I rea

Re: VCS for squid3 development?

On Fri, 2007-12-28 at 10:34 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2007, Henrik Nordstr?m wrote: > > fre 2007-12-28 klockan 08:25 +0900 skrev Adrian Chadd: > > > I've been following the VCS debate a little. > > > > > > Guys, I'm not an enormous fan of CVS, but what we have works, and > > >

Re: VCS for squid3 development?

On Fri, 2007-12-28 at 08:25 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote: > I've been following the VCS debate a little. > > Guys, I'm not an enormous fan of CVS, but what we have works *badly*. 150 emails when autoconf changes are made for instance. > , and > I think we have bigger things to work on right now th

Re: VCS for squid3 development?

On Fri, Dec 28, 2007, Henrik Nordstr?m wrote: > fre 2007-12-28 klockan 08:25 +0900 skrev Adrian Chadd: > > I've been following the VCS debate a little. > > > > Guys, I'm not an enormous fan of CVS, but what we have works, and > > I think we have bigger things to work on right now than a VCS migrat

Re: VCS for squid3 development?

fre 2007-12-28 klockan 08:25 +0900 skrev Adrian Chadd: > I've been following the VCS debate a little. > > Guys, I'm not an enormous fan of CVS, but what we have works, and > I think we have bigger things to work on right now than a VCS migration. > Unless someone can show how we'll improve product

Re: VCS for squid3 development?

tor 2007-12-27 klockan 07:52 +1100 skrev Robert Collins: > Do I have sufficient access to do this? I'm not a BSD afficiondo anyhow, > so perhaps its best if I say 'install the bzr port' as long as its at > version 1.0 now. (If its not we can just install by hand). Same for > loggerhead which a tri

Re: VCS for squid3 development?

I've been following the VCS debate a little. Guys, I'm not an enormous fan of CVS, but what we have works, and I think we have bigger things to work on right now than a VCS migration. Unless someone can show how we'll improve productivity or bring on board more developers to work on Squid then I d

Re: VCS for squid3 development?

On Sat, 2007-12-22 at 04:18 +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > On tor, 2007-12-20 at 22:48 +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > > What I am interested in is: > > - If someone puts the effort in to perform a migration of data and > > scripts (I'm offering to do this during my christmas break), whats the

Re: VCS for squid3 development?

On tor, 2007-12-20 at 22:48 +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > All these meet the needs listed above. My strong preference is bzr; its > recently reached 1.0 and I'm extremely familiar with it due to having > spent some years on it. In a broad sense hg/monotone/bzr/git are very > similar, and darcs is

Re: VCS for squid3 development?

On Dec 20, 2007 12:48 PM, Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This has come up a few times. In past years we did a trial with Arch, > which did not work at all well for various reasons. > > However, there are now very serious and usable alternatives to CVS. > > Lets choose one. And move the

VCS for squid3 development?

This has come up a few times. In past years we did a trial with Arch, which did not work at all well for various reasons. However, there are now very serious and usable alternatives to CVS. Lets choose one. And move the 3.1 HEAD over to that. We can move 3.0's repo over or not - I don't particula