On 13/05/2014 4:56 a.m., Michael Pye wrote:
On 2014-05-12 16:52, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Here is the guts of the original patch as should be relevant to
Squid-3.5 (or 3.4).
http://master.squid-cache.org/~amosjeffries/patches/Pye_s35.patch
Many thanks Amos, I've just tried this and it does
On 13/05/2014 10:52 p.m., Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 13/05/2014 4:56 a.m., Michael Pye wrote:
On 2014-05-12 16:52, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Here is the guts of the original patch as should be relevant to
Squid-3.5 (or 3.4).
http://master.squid-cache.org/~amosjeffries/patches/Pye_s35.patch
Many
On 2014-05-13 11:53, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 13/05/2014 10:52 p.m., Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 13/05/2014 4:56 a.m., Michael Pye wrote:
On 2014-05-12 16:52, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Here is the guts of the original patch as should be relevant to
Squid-3.5 (or 3.4).
On 2014-05-13 11:53, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 13/05/2014 10:52 p.m., Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 13/05/2014 4:56 a.m., Michael Pye wrote:
On 2014-05-12 16:52, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Here is the guts of the original patch as should be relevant to
Squid-3.5 (or 3.4).
On 2014-05-11 18:40, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Not as yet. Henrik pointed out a problem that needed testing:
http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-dev/201005/0156.html
I dont think we send only-if-cached any longer.
Can you confirm that, or answer Henriks question?
Sorry - I can't
On 13/05/2014 2:25 a.m., Michael Pye wrote:
On 2014-05-11 18:40, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Not as yet. Henrik pointed out a problem that needed testing:
http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-dev/201005/0156.html
I dont think we send only-if-cached any longer.
Can you confirm that, or
On 2014-05-12 16:52, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Here is the guts of the original patch as should be relevant to
Squid-3.5 (or 3.4).
http://master.squid-cache.org/~amosjeffries/patches/Pye_s35.patch
Many thanks Amos, I've just tried this and it does indeed query sibling
for stale content as we want.
On 12/05/2014 4:39 a.m., Michael Pye wrote: On 24/05/2010 19:17,
senad.cimic wrote:
On 05/23/2010 09:52 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
How about:
When Squid has a stale cached response available, it will not
query siblings, by default. When this setting is on Squid will
do so, as long as the
senad.ci...@thomsonreuters.com wrote:
Modified patch file is attached. I committed those documentation changes
as well.
-Senad
+1. Looks okay now.
Amos
--
Please be using
Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.3
: [MERGE] Squid Patch (revision 10487)
On 05/23/2010 09:52 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
How about:
When Squid has a stale cached response available, it will not
query siblings, by default. When this setting is on Squid will
do so, as long as the cache_peer line for the sibling does not
have
-cache.org
Subject: Re: [MERGE] Squid Patch (revision 10487)
On 05/23/2010 09:52 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
How about:
When Squid has a stale cached response available, it will not
query siblings, by default. When this setting is on Squid will
do so, as long as the cache_peer line for the sibling
On 05/23/2010 09:52 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
How about:
When Squid has a stale cached response available, it will not
query siblings, by default. When this setting is on Squid will
do so, as long as the cache_peer line for the sibling does not
have the 'allow-miss' option configured.
?
On 05/19/2010 08:00 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
Minor suggestions for the documentation:
+NAME: access_sibling_when_stale
+COMMENT: on|off
+TYPE: onoff
+DEFAULT: off
+LOC: Config.onoff.access_sibling_for_stale_resource
+DOC_START
+ By default, Squid will not contact siblings when it
ons 2010-05-19 klockan 10:03 -0500 skrev senad.ci...@thomsonreuters.com:
Not sure what went wrong, but since changes in each of the 3 files are
minimal I included differences as attachments (new version for each
file is on top, old version is on bottom):
Probably got converted from UNIX to DOS
tis 2010-05-18 klockan 16:25 -0500 skrev senad.ci...@thomsonreuters.com:
Attached file is generated patch for the issue where squid does not
contact its siblings for the stale resources. New directive has been
added to make this behavior optional.
Corrected patch attached showing only your
sometimes.
Amos
Thanks in advance,
Senad
-Original Message-
From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 6:55 PM
To: squid-dev@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [MERGE] Squid Patch (revision 10487)
On Tue, 18 May 2010 16:25:31 -0500, senad.ci
tor 2010-05-20 klockan 12:00 +1000 skrev Mark Nottingham:
H, is setting the default to on a bad thing?
Probably not, as the code takes care of allow-miss.
related to this the behavior when the sibling rejects the request need
to be verified. This change will make only-if-cached rejections in
On Tue, 18 May 2010 16:25:31 -0500, senad.ci...@thomsonreuters.com
wrote:
Attached file is generated patch for the issue where squid does not
contact its siblings for the stale resources. New directive has been
added to make this behavior optional.
Let me know if any issues.
Something has
tis 2010-03-30 klockan 18:15 +1000 skrev HC Barfield:
hi,
i was wondering if you can release squid with the 'intermittant connections
patch' so that it is more suitable for home users and so we got some good
FREE software, as the alternatives are not convienent.
Found that patch in the
Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 17.04.2007 13:57:31:
tis 2007-04-17 klockan 11:28 +0700 skrev áÎÄÒÅÊ áÔÁÎÇÕÌÏ×/çÏÒáÄÍ/ôÏÍÓË:
Greetings.
Yesterday i recieved an email with notification of patch request of
feature
i've already coded for myself.
here's request:
tis 2007-04-17 klockan 11:28 +0700 skrev áÎÄÒÅÊ áÔÁÎÇÕÌÏ×/çÏÒáÄÍ/ôÏÍÓË:
Greetings.
Yesterday i recieved an email with notification of patch request of feature
i've already coded for myself.
here's request: http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=491
here's my diffs for
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Rafael Martinez Torres wrote:
MANY-MANY TIMES ON A SOURCE-FILE. This become unreadable, since properly
speaking, IPv6 does not provide any application funcionality, like modules
snmp, wwcp...and your code is exhaustevely full of #ifdef INET6.
Indeed, and any IPv6
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Rafael Martinez Torres wrote:
MANY-MANY TIMES ON A SOURCE-FILE. This become unreadable, since properly
speaking, IPv6 does not provide any application funcionality, like
modules
snmp, wwcp...and your code is exhaustevely full of #ifdef INET6.
Indeed,
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, [ISO-8859-1] Xuân Baldauf wrote:
It would be nice if you could give Rafael cvs commit access (if not already
done)
Rafael, please see http://devel.squid-cache.org/howto.html for
instructions if this interests you.
Regards
Henrik
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Rafael Martinez Torres wrote:
Hi:
Following procedure to get commit access into SQUID CVS repository, I
introduce
myself:
sourceForge account name: rmartinez
interest: contribute to port squid3 module into IPv6, namely module squid3
/ branch squid3-ipv6, leaded by Xuan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
to Whom it may concern:
I, Rafael Martinez, software developer integrated at Euro6IX proyect
(http://www.euro6ix.org),
would like to join the SQUID developer's team in order to contribute the
CVS version to be ported into IPv6.
I have valuable
Rafael Martinez Torres wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
to Whom it may concern:
I, Rafael Martinez, software developer integrated at Euro6IX proyect
(http://www.euro6ix.org),
would like to join the SQUID developer's team in order to contribute the
CVS version to be ported into
27 matches
Mail list logo
