Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz writes:
On 30/01/2013 2:47 p.m., Rainer Weikusat wrote:
What's the point of putting these onto the event queue? Wouldn't this
be better done with something like this?
The Call queue and the Events queue are drained individually in
alternating fashion. The
ons 2013-01-30 klockan 12:21 + skrev Rainer Weikusat:
Thank you. The reason I'm asking is mainly because 0-delay events are,
according to the comment in schedule, supposed to be executed in FIFO
order. Is this generally true for events, ie is the actual ordering
criterion always a pair
What's the point of putting these onto the event queue? Wouldn't this
be better done with something like this?
NB: I would submit a proper patch for this if it was.
-
--- mad-squid-ev0/src/event.cc 8 Jan 2013 17:36:44 - 1.1.1.3
+++ mad-squid-ev0/src/event.cc 30
On 30/01/2013 2:47 p.m., Rainer Weikusat wrote:
What's the point of putting these onto the event queue? Wouldn't this
be better done with something like this?
The Call queue and the Events queue are drained individually in
alternating fashion. The first 0-delay event will not run until after
