Re: future of icap-patch

2005-05-03 Thread Tsantilas Christos
Hi, Ok the news for icap-patch for squid are not good. I am putting some effort and I believe that day by day will become more stable. Baumgaertel Oliver wrote: I've taken a look at 2.5.STABLE9 and managed sofar to apply all the patches but the 2Gig one to this combination, creating a thing that

Re: AW: future of icap-patch

2005-05-03 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Baumgaertel Oliver wrote: Well Henrik, that was my point exactly. The problem I have with that is plain and simple. Squid 3 is in development since what, 3 years now? It'll take at least another year to get it into a usable, complete release. Yes. Not the proudest release

Re: AW: future of icap-patch

2005-05-03 Thread Tsantilas Christos
Baumgaertel Oliver wrote: Same procedure as last time... It won't patch against the normal STABLE9 branch. What is exactly what I was talking about in the first place. It's no use if we can't run the patch at least against ones that were already introduced some time

future of icap-patch

2005-05-02 Thread Baumgaertel Oliver
Hi all. My company uses squid with ntlm and icap. That's a very unlucky combination I understand, as the history tells us that it's an unstable one. I've managed to fix or work around the various assertions in 2.5.STABLE6, so that we can be sure it's not crashing. You see, our farms are the

Re: future of icap-patch

2005-05-02 Thread Joe Cooper
Henrik Nordstrom wrote: On Mon, 2 May 2005, Baumgaertel Oliver wrote: I do understand that there were a couple of people in the past asking for exactly that and it was denied. I am currently in the position to have the freedom to start a new icap code project. But before I dive headfirst into