Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
mån 2007-05-28 klockan 23:17 +0800 skrev Adrian Chadd:
Personally, I think we've all learnt a bit from this experience, and
there's a clearer path forward for tidying up the string (ab)uses going
on in the codebase.
I'm all for calling this a lesson learnt, backing it o
mån 2007-05-28 klockan 23:17 +0800 skrev Adrian Chadd:
> Personally, I think we've all learnt a bit from this experience, and
> there's a clearer path forward for tidying up the string (ab)uses going
> on in the codebase.
>
> I'm all for calling this a lesson learnt, backing it out now, then
> co
On Tue, May 29, 2007, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> I was waiting on Alex (or anyones) response to my last email, before
> going either way.
well, count this as a reply to your last email. :)
> partial backout: proposal (no responses)
> full backout: 3 for, 2 wavering with doubts, 1 abstention.
Perso
Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi guys,
Could we please make a decision about SqString? I'm leaning towards
backing it out for now, releasing Squid-3, and then doing a phased
introduction post squid-3 - starting with just accessor method
changes..
Adrian
I was waiting on Alex (or anyones) response to
Hi guys,
Could we please make a decision about SqString? I'm leaning towards
backing it out for now, releasing Squid-3, and then doing a phased
introduction post squid-3 - starting with just accessor method
changes..
Adrian
