On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> * in ConnStateData::readSomeData(), is it ok to just return if the socket
> is marked as half closed? Will a half-closed socket ever be re-opened
> somehow?
To explain half-closed connections
A TCP connection consists of two independent flows of tr
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> * i start mirroring something via lftp
> * lftp uses Keepalive in its HTTP requests
> * I hit ctrl-C in lftp
> * a client fd does this:
> - read handler gets called, size 0
> - commMarkHalfClosed() is called
> - ... no more IO is scheduled
> - wri
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> > Is there actually a valid reason for squid to even support
> > half-closed connections any more?
>
> Personally I don't beleive in half-closed connections in HTTP, but some
> people like to be able to
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Is there actually a valid reason for squid to even support
> half-closed connections any more?
Personally I don't beleive in half-closed connections in HTTP, but some
people like to be able to do things like
(echo "GET http://www.squid-cache.org HTTP/1
Is there actually a valid reason for squid to even support
half-closed connections any more?
It just seems like an utter pain in the butt to support correctly..
I'm trying to track down a bug in the FTP paths relating to
incorrect half-closed handling..
Adrian
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004, Robert Collins wrote:
> >
> > > just commit it.
> >
> > ok.
>
> Except for the first segment in the patch (-lepoll removed)
>
Crap, must've missed that. I'll put it back.
Ad
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Done. Can someone bootstrap it and commit it?
bootstrapping is done automatically before each nightly snapshot.
Regards
Henrik
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > just commit it.
>
> ok.
Except for the first segment in the patch (-lepoll removed)
Regards
Henrik
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004, Kinkie wrote:
> > yup, this has to do with the order we're checking poll/select/epoll/kqueue.
> > Here's my configure.in patch, it seems to do the right thing.
> > Give it a shot?
>
> If it's possible at all, I think it would be best if the polling method
> detection could b
Adrian Chadd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2004, David Nicklay wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I second Henrik's suggestion. The epoll stuff actually works on 2.4
>> kernels with a patch, and almost none of those have the new epoll stuff
>> in glibc.
>>
>> Also, it would be nice if someon
10 matches
Mail list logo