Re: squid3 future directory structure

2008-02-27 Thread Kinkie
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:37 AM, Alex Rousskov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 11:33 +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
  So you would recommend something like

 http/request_method.cc
  and
 acl/request_header_strategy.h

I prefer not to use camelcase when it comes to filenames, so count my
vote for this proposal.

-- 
/kinkie


Re: Time for squid 3.0 STABLE2 ?

2008-02-27 Thread Amos Jeffries

Henrik Nordström wrote:

tis 2008-02-19 klockan 23:00 +0100 skrev Guido Serassio:

Hi,

What about to release squid 3.0 STABLE2 ?


Probably, even if I prefer to fix forwarding of large response headers
first.. but it should not be a blocker for STABLE2..

I think that there are many patches already applied to HEAD-3 that 
could be applied also to SQUID_3_0.


Certainly.

Regards
Henrik


Henrik, could you check your patch 11467 and port it to 3.0 please?
It's not applying cleanly.

Amos
--
Please use Squid 2.6STABLE17+ or 3.0STABLE1+
There are serious security advisories out on all earlier releases.


Re: Time for squid 3.0 STABLE2 ?

2008-02-27 Thread Amos Jeffries


Just a few issues remaining before 3.0.STABLE-2.

 * patch 11467 back-porting.

 * Close more bugs?
  http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2127
  http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2124

why is this not 2.6??
  http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2138


 * Build and tests on as many OS as possible. (branch: SQUID_3_0)

  I am running the tests I use on Debian/Ubuntu already. Could the rest 
of you please jump in for any OS you have tests for or even just 
compiling on.



 * CVS branching? checkpoint?.
  Will need another How-To here I think Henrik.

 * Release announcement.


Amos
--
Please use Squid 2.6STABLE17+ or 3.0STABLE1+
There are serious security advisories out on all earlier releases.


Squid conference

2008-02-27 Thread Alex Rousskov
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 15:20 +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote:
 Is this going to be a semi-regular event? I'd be interested in  
 participating in the future, but need more lead time to arrange  
 travel...

If enough folks want to meet, we should organize a Squid Conference. A
conference would allow users, vendors, and developers to discuss all
matters related to the Squid project in a high-bandwidth environment. We
can do hands-on training sessions and even vendor exhibits if enough
people sign up for the event.

A conference will require planning in advance, of course.

If you are potentially interested, please post here or email me
personally. Please name two or three cities where you would prefer to
meet and mention any scheduling preferences you may have.

Thank you,

Alex.




Re: Time for squid 3.0 STABLE2 ?

2008-02-27 Thread Henrik Nordstrom

On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 01:04 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
 Just a few issues remaining before 3.0.STABLE-2.
 
   * patch 11467 back-porting.

cd English
ls ERR_* ../list


   * Close more bugs?
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2127
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2124
 
  why is this not 2.6??
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2138
 
 
   * Build and tests on as many OS as possible. (branch: SQUID_3_0)
 
I am running the tests I use on Debian/Ubuntu already. Could the rest 
 of you please jump in for any OS you have tests for or even just 
 compiling on.
 
 
   * CVS branching? checkpoint?.
Will need another How-To here I think Henrik.
 
   * Release announcement.
 
 
 Amos



Re: Time for squid 3.0 STABLE2 ?

2008-02-27 Thread Henrik Nordstrom

On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 01:04 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
 Just a few issues remaining before 3.0.STABLE-2.
 
   * patch 11467 back-porting.

cd English
ls ERR_* ../list

   * Close more bugs?
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2127

Is closed and verified by the reporter.

http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2124

Done.

  why is this not 2.6??
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2138

Don't know.

   * CVS branching? checkpoint?.
Will need another How-To here I think Henrik.t

update releasenotes and changelog.

login on squid/cache.org and

- get an up to date checkout of the tree
  cvs up -d -P
- make sure the version in configure.in is correct
- ./bootstrap.sh
- cvs commit
- cvs tag SQUID_3_0_STABLE2
- ./mkrelease.sh squid-3.0.STABLE2 
/server/httpd/htdocs/squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.0/
  (i think, verify the path)
this should give you a suitable tarball in the website.

download that, and the previous release and signature as well.

verify the signature of the previous release

make a diff between the two, and audit that diff to verify that the
changes looks right.

sign the new release and diff.

upload the diff and signatures to the 3.0 folder on the web server.

go to the 3.0 web folder

co -l index.tmpl

edit index.tmpl, moving the previous release down to older stable
releases and the new as current stable release.

./make.sh

verify that it got published right.

copy the tarballs, diff, release notes and signatures to the ftp area.

send announce



Re: Time for squid 3.0 STABLE2 ?

2008-02-27 Thread Tsantilas Christos
Hi all,

Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
 On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 01:04 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
 
   * Close more bugs?
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2127
 
 Is closed and verified by the reporter.
 


About bug 2127, my understanding is that there are references about two
bugs here.
I am not sure, but I think the original bug reported here did not solved
and still exists 

Regards,
   Christos


Re: Time for squid 3.0 STABLE2 ?

2008-02-27 Thread Amos Jeffries

 On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 01:04 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
 Just a few issues remaining before 3.0.STABLE-2.

snip done
   * Close more bugs?

Booger:

stub time| COSS block-size = 512 bytes
stub time| COSS largest file offset = -1 KB
stub time| COSS cache_dir size = 102400 KB
stub time| Fatal: COSS cache_dir size exceeds largest offset
.FAIL: tests/testCoss




  why is this not 2.6??
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2138

 Don't know.

   * CVS branching? checkpoint?.
Will need another How-To here I think Henrik.t

 update releasenotes and changelog.

done.



remainder pending the make-check failure.

 login on squid/cache.org and

 - get an up to date checkout of the tree
   cvs up -d -P
 - make sure the version in configure.in is correct
 - ./bootstrap.sh
 - cvs commit
 - cvs tag SQUID_3_0_STABLE2
 - ./mkrelease.sh squid-3.0.STABLE2
 /server/httpd/htdocs/squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.0/
   (i think, verify the path)
 this should give you a suitable tarball in the website.

 download that, and the previous release and signature as well.

 verify the signature of the previous release

 make a diff between the two, and audit that diff to verify that the
 changes looks right.

 sign the new release and diff.

 upload the diff and signatures to the 3.0 folder on the web server.

 go to the 3.0 web folder

 co -l index.tmpl

 edit index.tmpl, moving the previous release down to older stable
 releases and the new as current stable release.

 ./make.sh

 verify that it got published right.

 copy the tarballs, diff, release notes and signatures to the ftp area.

 send announce






Re: Time for squid 3.0 STABLE2 ?

2008-02-27 Thread Adrian Chadd
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008, Amos Jeffries wrote:

* Close more bugs?
 
 Booger:
 
 stub time| COSS block-size = 512 bytes
 stub time| COSS largest file offset = -1 KB
 stub time| COSS cache_dir size = 102400 KB
 stub time| Fatal: COSS cache_dir size exceeds largest offset
 .FAIL: tests/testCoss

I'd suggest just disabling COSS in -3 until someone ports over the changes
or replaces it with something better.

It really is actually very broken for even light production use.




Adrian