On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 15:35 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Agreed and changed.
I am glad we are making progress even though we seem to have conflicting
ideas of what an average user visiting the download page needs or
understands.
Yes remove or yes not discuss
Both. IMO, the second sentence on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thanks, Amos.
Today, just request-side handling of Cache-Control: max-stale=0
(HttpHdrCc.c, 2.6-STABLE7+).
If request's Cache-Control: max-stale has any positive value, Squid
passes it through. Shouldn't the allowed range include 0
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 15:35 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
While we are at it what about the text and links following the releases
table.
* The Pending bugs link might be useful for 2.x.
Maybe. We had that for 2.5, but I never found that link to give any
really meaningful results. But we
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 10:08 -0400, Matt Benjamin wrote:
Today, just request-side handling of Cache-Control: max-stale=0
(HttpHdrCc.c, 2.6-STABLE7+).
If request's Cache-Control: max-stale has any positive value, Squid
passes it through. Shouldn't the allowed range include 0 (delta-seconds
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Henrik,
1. I'll file a bug. I have the patch for it too, of course
2. The client in the case we've run into seems to be a network device, a
proxy or traffic-management server--google finds examples of other folks
doing it
3. The current code
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 18:16 -0400, Matt Benjamin wrote:
3. The current code is problematic because the spec has max-stale
without a value equivalent to max-stale: (Infinity)
Oh, I thought it didn't forward max-stale=0 at all.
Forwarding it as max-stale without a delta is defenitely a bug. The
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 23:33 +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 18:16 -0400, Matt Benjamin wrote:
3. The current code is problematic because the spec has max-stale
without a value equivalent to max-stale: (Infinity)
Oh, I thought it didn't forward max-stale=0 at all.
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 15:35 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
While we are at it what about the text and links following the releases
table.
* The Pending bugs link might be useful for 2.x.
Maybe. We had that for 2.5, but I never found that link to give any
really
