Hi Amos.
Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz writes:
On 6/07/2012 6:29 a.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 07/05/2012 11:38 AM, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
Alex Rousskov writes:
I suggest adding StoreController::keepInLocalMemory(e) that will
correctly check whether memory caching is enabled at all
While building the helper changes it has become clear that the
--enable-ntlm-fail-open feature has been half missing for quite some time.
The SMB helper sends the LD code back to Squid when the directive is
compiled in, but there is no Squid code handling such responses, back as
far as squid-2.
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote:
While building the helper changes it has become clear that the
--enable-ntlm-fail-open feature has been half missing for quite some time.
The SMB helper sends the LD code back to Squid when the directive is
compiled in,
On 07/05/2012 09:02 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
It sounds like another analysis of the places calling trimMemory() is
needed.
StoreEntry::trimMemory() is only called from StoreEntry::swapOut(),
before we are starting to swap data out (or skipping swap because the
entry is not swappable). Ideally,
On 07/01/2012 02:25 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Thank you. In most places the problem is that AccessLogEntry is the
closest thing we have to a XactionData object for the whole HTTP
transaction. (I still have patches waiting around to polish up and
submit for audit creating that master transaction
On 07/06/2012 08:41 AM, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
On 07/01/2012 02:25 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Thank you. In most places the problem is that AccessLogEntry is the
closest thing we have to a XactionData object for the whole HTTP
transaction. (I still have patches waiting around to polish up and
On 07/06/2012 05:55 PM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 07/06/2012 08:41 AM, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
On 07/01/2012 02:25 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Thank you. In most places the problem is that AccessLogEntry is the
closest thing we have to a XactionData object for the whole HTTP
transaction. (I
tor 2012-07-05 klockan 16:00 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries:
The blob only exists in this discussion for two reasons; the old helpers
backward compatibility requires it, and you wanted to discuss a body
field for the responses. Even not understanding properly the specifics
of why you wanted to
On 5/07/2012 4:16 p.m., Robert Collins wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Why do we need backwards compat in the new protocol?
As an alternative, consider setting a protocol= option on the helpers,
making the default our latest-and-greatest,a nd folk running
On 07/06/2012 07:11 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 7/07/2012 2:36 a.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 07/05/2012 09:02 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
It sounds like another analysis of the places calling trimMemory() is
needed.
StoreEntry::trimMemory() is only called from StoreEntry::swapOut(),
before we
10 matches
Mail list logo