Re: v3 roadmap

2008-03-24 Thread Alex Rousskov
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 21:29 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> Alex Rousskov wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 15:24 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> >> Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 11:15 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> >>>
>    - I'm kind of in favour of it as a pure file-movements-only 
>  alteration.  3.2 has no feature-requests yet and back-porting across a 
>  file-re-arranged setup is likely to be more trouble than its worth.
> >>> bzr tracks renames and merges changes across them fine. bzr operates
> >>> using abstract file identifiers, separate from the file names.
> >>>
> >>> you only run into trouble from tree reshuffles if you split/merge files,
> >>> or don't tell bzr that you are renaming a file.. 
> >>>
> >>> bzr help mv
> >>>
> >> Well, in light of that I don't have any objections to starting the 
> >> re-ordering now.
> > 
> > OK. My plan is to publish the first eCAP-related changes for review and
> > then start working on a cleanup patch.
> > 
> >> I'd like to be closely involved though to get my head around the changes.
> > 
> > Sure. Please review the source cleanup feature and raise any objections.
> > I will start with the big changes already listed there, I guess.
> 
> I assume you mean /Features/SourceLayout ??

Yes, sorry for not quoting the URL.
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/SourceLayout

Alex.




Re: v3 roadmap

2008-03-24 Thread Amos Jeffries

Alex Rousskov wrote:

On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 15:24 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:

Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 11:15 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:

  - I'm kind of in favour of it as a pure file-movements-only 
alteration.  3.2 has no feature-requests yet and back-porting across a 
file-re-arranged setup is likely to be more trouble than its worth.

bzr tracks renames and merges changes across them fine. bzr operates
using abstract file identifiers, separate from the file names.

you only run into trouble from tree reshuffles if you split/merge files,
or don't tell bzr that you are renaming a file.. 


bzr help mv

Well, in light of that I don't have any objections to starting the 
re-ordering now.


OK. My plan is to publish the first eCAP-related changes for review and
then start working on a cleanup patch.


I'd like to be closely involved though to get my head around the changes.


Sure. Please review the source cleanup feature and raise any objections.
I will start with the big changes already listed there, I guess.


I assume you mean /Features/SourceLayout ??



Let's move further discussions, if any to squid-dev.


It's already been there for while, though the subject does not indicate 
it. Trimmed up.


Amos
--
Please use Squid 2.6STABLE17+ or 3.0STABLE1+
There are serious security advisories out on all earlier releases.