On Fri, Mar 18, 2005, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2005, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> >I'm thinking of some simple feedback from the client -> server saying
> >"yup, I've copied a little more".
>
> Ok. Along the same lines I outlined some day ago then.
I'm sure its not a new concept - I'm
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I'm thinking of some simple feedback from the client -> server saying
"yup, I've copied a little more".
Ok. Along the same lines I outlined some day ago then.
The http.c side stuff can then stop reading when it finds itself too far
ahead, and resume reading
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> >I've created a new squid-2.5 branch in sourceforge - tidyup_deferred_reads.
> >I'm going to play around with re-arranging or replacing the deferred reads
> >mechanism with something a little more flexible
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I've created a new squid-2.5 branch in sourceforge - tidyup_deferred_reads.
I'm going to play around with re-arranging or replacing the deferred reads
mechanism with something a little more flexible and event-driven-io happy.
What ideas do you have on how th
Hiya,
I've created a new squid-2.5 branch in sourceforge - tidyup_deferred_reads.
I'm going to play around with re-arranging or replacing the deferred reads
mechanism with something a little more flexible and event-driven-io happy.
Adrian
--
Adrian Chadd"To believe with
