Re: [squid-dev] dlink question

2016-09-15 Thread Adam Majer
On 09/14/2016 03:22 PM, Kinkie wrote:
> That's a very good question. We are in fact slowly refactoring from our
> custom data structures to std:: wherever appropriate. If you wish to
> join the effort, patches are welcome :)

OK. I will see what I can do in this regard.

- Adam


___
squid-dev mailing list
squid-dev@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-dev


Re: [squid-dev] dlink question

2016-09-14 Thread Kinkie
Hi Adam.
That's a very good question. We are in fact slowly refactoring from our
custom data structures to std:: wherever appropriate. If you wish to join
the effort, patches are welcome :)
  Kinkie

On Wednesday, 14 September 2016, Adam Majer  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> This maybe a very naive question, but why is squid 4.x still using
> manually crafted double linked list? (dlink) Why not just use std::list
> instead?
>
> - Adam
>
> ___
> squid-dev mailing list
> squid-dev@lists.squid-cache.org 
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-dev
>


-- 
@mobile
___
squid-dev mailing list
squid-dev@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-dev