Re: bundlebuggy improvement

2008-03-18 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 09:57 +0100, Kinkie wrote: The idea is nice, but a bit dangerous IMO, as it lends itself to abuse. I second that we can try it out, and see how it works out. I think it will work out well. And in any case there is a second level human filter to make the actual commit.

Re: tcp proxy hackery

2008-03-18 Thread Kinkie
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 3:00 AM, Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Mar 18, 2008, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: Does it? Most mallocs I know about has details about the allocated region just before the pointer (and optional red zone).

Re: tcp proxy hackery

2008-03-18 Thread Adrian Chadd
http://www.creative.net.au/diffs/test1-355.tar.gz I've fixed the last few bugs - I'm seeing some occasional connect() failures from the ab box to the proxy server but that may be the hacky apachebench code. I can handle ~ 12,000 proxied connections a second at 96 byte replies. Userland CPU use

Re: [squid-core] v3 roadmap

2008-03-18 Thread Amos Jeffries
Amos Jeffries wrote: Alex Rousskov wrote: On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 00:25 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: I'm looking forward a few weeks to 3.0.STABLE3 by march 31st Great! Possibly even a 3.1.DEVEL0 at the same time. This should probably be discussed on squid-dev, but there are currently

Re: [squid-core] v3 roadmap

2008-03-18 Thread Alex Rousskov
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 11:15 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: The file re-arranging polish: - I'm kind of in favour of it as a pure file-movements-only alteration. 3.2 has no feature-requests yet and back-porting across a file-re-arranged setup is likely to be more trouble than its worth. Can

Re: [squid-core] v3 roadmap

2008-03-18 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 11:15 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: - I'm kind of in favour of it as a pure file-movements-only alteration. 3.2 has no feature-requests yet and back-porting across a file-re-arranged setup is likely to be more trouble than its worth. bzr tracks renames and merges

Re: [Squid Web Proxy Wiki] Update of Features/LogDaemon by Amos Jeffries

2008-03-18 Thread Adrian Chadd
Uhm, I'll do it Amos. It won't take me that long. I'll wait for your source organisation to be completed before I bring over the changes. Adrian On Tue, Mar 18, 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Squid Web Proxy Wiki for

Re: [squid-core] v3 roadmap

2008-03-18 Thread Amos Jeffries
Alex Rousskov wrote: On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 11:15 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: The file re-arranging polish: - I'm kind of in favour of it as a pure file-movements-only alteration. 3.2 has no feature-requests yet and back-porting across a file-re-arranged setup is likely to be more trouble

Re: bundlebunny improvement

2008-03-18 Thread Alex Rousskov
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 01:52 +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: It would be great if bundlebunny could accept email votes without first requiring an account. The rules on who may vode is not restricted to just squid-core, even if votes from squid-core is more important. My view regarding the

Re: Features/LogDaemon

2008-03-18 Thread Alex Rousskov
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 18:54 -0600, Adrian Chadd wrote: Uhm, I'll do it Amos. It won't take me that long. I'll wait for your source organisation to be completed before I bring over the changes. It looks like Amos wants the source reorganization to be the last project committed to v3.1. If my