Hello,
Make distuninstallcheck may fail because when we pass $(RM) to
scripts/remove-cfg.sh, the variable value is passed as two parameters:
rm and -f. The script expects it to be a single parameter.
The earlier patch discussed below worked at the time of commit but
something has changed
Bundle Buggy has detected this merge request.
For details, see:
http://bundlebuggy.aaronbentley.com/project/squid/request/%3C4A327FC0.7090709%40measurement-factory.com%3E
Project: Squid
I recently ran into a bug on Squid 2.7 regarding cached content with
ETags. Currently, if all cached entries for a URL include ETags, and a
request is received for said URL with no If-None-Match header, Squid
will serve a cached entry. This behavior does not follow RFC 2616. I
have attached
Hi everybody,
That sounds more like WAN optimisation than proxying.
Yes of course, but Squid also optimize the WAN. Squid is a ProxyCache
Squid is proxy and cache for http, ftp, gopher and wais (whois also ;-) )
I have a little question: is it possible to use Squid for caching
Alex Rousskov wrote:
Hello,
Make distuninstallcheck may fail because when we pass $(RM) to
scripts/remove-cfg.sh, the variable value is passed as two parameters:
rm and -f. The script expects it to be a single parameter.
The earlier patch discussed below worked at the time of commit
Jorge Novo wrote:
Hi everybody,
That sounds more like WAN optimisation than proxying.
Yes of course, but Squid also optimize the WAN. Squid is a ProxyCache
Squid is proxy and cache for http, ftp, gopher and wais (whois also ;-) )
No. Squid is an HTTP proxy and HTTP cache.
It can retrieve
What requirement in RFC2616 does this violate?
On 13/06/2009, at 3:02 AM, Jason Noble wrote:
I recently ran into a bug on Squid 2.7 regarding cached content with
ETags. Currently, if all cached entries for a URL include ETags,
and a request is received for said URL with no If-None-Match
