Re: Issue compiling last 3.1 squid in 64-bit platform

2009-11-10 Thread renator
If you need me to do any type of specific test or use any compile options, please let me know and I would be glad to help! Thanks again for your effort! tis 2009-11-10 klockan 23:41 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries: Yet I ported those fixes down and he still reports it in the snapshot built

Re: Issue compiling last 3.1 squid in 64-bit platform

2009-11-10 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
tis 2009-11-10 klockan 23:41 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries: Yet I ported those fixes down and he still reports it in the snapshot built afterwards. :( I think something went wrong in that port, the build farm also failed.. was a number of iterations in trunk before it worked right. Regards

Introducing Myself

2009-11-10 Thread Renato Murilo Langona
Greetings, My name is Renato, I'm from Brazil and I work as a network and server administrator consultant full time. We have several squid servers and now I'm very glad to be able to test the DEV brand of this incredible software. Actually I like the tproxy new feature integrated to the 3.1

Re: Issue compiling last 3.1 squid in 64-bit platform

2009-11-10 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
can you try ftp://ftp.squid-cache.se/private/squid-3.1.0.14-BZR.tar.bz2 (snapshot of current sources in bzr) this is fixed so that it builds for me on Fedora 11. tis 2009-11-10 klockan 09:14 -0200 skrev rena...@flash.net.br: If you need me to do any type of specific test or use any compile

Re: Issue compiling last 3.1 squid in 64-bit platform

2009-11-10 Thread renator
Worked like a charm! I tried to compile it using no options in configure, but I still get the same error in Slackware-64: rm -f libDiskDaemon.a /usr/bin/ar cru libDiskDaemon.a DiskIO/DiskDaemon/DiskdFile.o DiskIO/DiskDaemon/DiskdIOStrategy.o DiskIO/DiskDaemon/DiskDaemonDiskIOModule.o ranlib

Re: Issue compiling last 3.1 squid in 64-bit platform

2009-11-10 Thread renator
Sorry for the Worked like a charm! line in my email. It was a mistake. I was writing the email while the software was compiling and I thought it worked. When I saw it didn't, I forgot to erase the first line. Blame on me! Sorry! Worked like a charm! I tried to compile it using no options in

Re: /bzr/squid3/trunk/ r10096: Bug 2778: fix linking issues using SunCC

2009-11-10 Thread Kinkie
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote: Francesco Chemolli wrote: revno: 10096 committer: Francesco Chemolli kin...@squid-cache.org branch nick: trunk timestamp: Fri 2009-11-06 17:22:16 +0100

Re: Issue compiling last 3.1 squid in 64-bit platform

2009-11-10 Thread renator
Just tried in Ubuntu 9.10 64-bit and it worked. I think it's something specific to Slackware 13.0 64BIT... Can I help, anyway? Thanks! Sorry for the Worked like a charm! line in my email. It was a mistake. I was writing the email while the software was compiling and I thought it worked. When

Re: /bzr/squid3/trunk/ r10096: Bug 2778: fix linking issues using SunCC

2009-11-10 Thread Amos Jeffries
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:47:22 +0100, Kinkie gkin...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote: Francesco Chemolli wrote: revno: 10096 committer: Francesco Chemolli

Re: /bzr/squid3/trunk/ r10095: Fixed linking convention mismatch in Asn ACL

2009-11-10 Thread Amos Jeffries
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:46:37 +0100, Kinkie gkin...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote: Francesco Chemolli wrote: revno: 10095 committer: Francesco Chemolli

Re: Issue compiling last 3.1 squid in 64-bit platform

2009-11-10 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
tis 2009-11-10 klockan 10:28 -0200 skrev rena...@flash.net.br: make[3]: *** No rule to make target `-lpthread', needed by `all-am'. Stop. Is your Fedora 11 64-bit? I will install Ubuntu-64 and try to compile it in the same server. As soon as I have the results I'll post back to you! It is

Re: /bzr/squid3/trunk/ r10096: Bug 2778: fix linking issues using SunCC

2009-11-10 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
ons 2009-11-11 klockan 10:38 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries: Worth a query to squid-users. Any OS which is so old it does not support the auto-tools and libraries we now need is a candidate. I'm thinking NextStep may be one more. Though I'm inclined to keep as much support as possible until we

Re: Issue compiling last 3.1 squid in 64-bit platform

2009-11-10 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
Found the culpit now.. configure.in: AC_CHECK_LIB(pthread, main,[DISK_LIBS=$DISK_LIBS -lpthread], src/Makefile.am: squid_DEPENDENCIES = ... @DISK_LIBS@ \ No idea why that passes without error on my F11 box when other such errors do not.. Regards Henrik

Re: Issue compiling last 3.1 squid in 64-bit platform

2009-11-10 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
Should be fixed in trunk now I hope.. Can you try applying the patch from http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/HEAD/changesets/squid-3-10105.patch ontop of the tree you downloaded before: note: you need to run bootstrap.sh after patching. tis 2009-11-10 klockan 23:43 +0100 skrev Henrik

[RFC] Libraries usage in configure.in and Makefiles

2009-11-10 Thread Amos Jeffries
Over that last few months the configure alterations I've been doing has introduced a slightly altered way of system library linkage. Henriks recent commit to remove one of these on grounds of being old has highlighted a need to document this and perhapse bring you all in on making the

Re: [RFC] Libraries usage in configure.in and Makefiles

2009-11-10 Thread Robert Collins
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 18:38 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: Why? A: The squid binary is topping 3.5MB in footprint with many of the small tool stopping 500KB each. A small but substantial amount of it is libraries inked but unused. Really? dynamically linked libraries should be tiny.

Re: [RFC] Libraries usage in configure.in and Makefiles

2009-11-10 Thread Amos Jeffries
Robert Collins wrote: On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 18:38 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: Why? A: The squid binary is topping 3.5MB in footprint with many of the small tool stopping 500KB each. A small but substantial amount of it is libraries inked but unused. Really? dynamically linked libraries

Re: [RFC] Libraries usage in configure.in and Makefiles

2009-11-10 Thread Robert Collins
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 19:43 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: Robert Collins wrote: On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 18:38 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: Why? A: The squid binary is topping 3.5MB in footprint with many of the small tool stopping 500KB each. A small but substantial amount of it is