On 30/01/2014 6:06 a.m., Tsantilas Christos wrote:
Hi all,
I am attaching a patch which try to add some notes which is missing from
key_extras documentation in squid.conf.documented. For example the
current squid.conf.documented in trunk does not say that the
expanded key_extras value is
[I may have figured out why we could not make progress before, and we
may be finally converging on a solution. P4 at the bottom. ]
On 01/29/2014 08:51 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 30/01/2014 1:44 p.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
P1: ignore ftp_epsv off for IPv6 servers.
What I was meaning was this
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Alex Rousskov
rouss...@measurement-factory.com wrote:
On 01/29/2014 02:32 PM, Kinkie wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 01/29/2014 07:08 AM, Kinkie wrote:
(in a trunk checkout)
bzr diff -r lp:/squid/squid/vector-to-stdvector
On 01/30/2014 12:14 PM, Kinkie wrote:
Ok, here's some numbers (same testing methodology as before)
Trunk: mean RPS (CPU time)
10029.11 (996.661872)
9786.60 (1021.695007)
10116.93 (988.395665)
9958.71 (1004.039956)
stdvector: mean RPS (CPUtime)
9732.57 (1027.426563)
10388.38
On 2014-01-31 04:24, w...@wiki.squid-cache.org wrote:
snip
+ || RPS || 39715 ||
+ || Bandwidth || 313 Mbit/sec sustained ||
+
... 600-bytes long document. Thats 1KB per transaction.
+ This number was taken in a '''controlled test environment'''. It has
nothing to do with the numbers
On 30 Jan 2014, at 21:38, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote:
On 2014-01-31 04:24, w...@wiki.squid-cache.org wrote:
snip
+ || RPS || 39715 ||
+ || Bandwidth || 313 Mbit/sec sustained ||
+
... 600-bytes long document. Thats 1KB per transaction.
+ This number was taken in a
On 01/29/2014 09:01 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 30/01/2014 2:06 p.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 01/29/2014 03:44 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 2014-01-30 06:55, Alex Rousskov wrote:
The kid executable (e.g., disker, coordinator, worker, etc.) path is
already covered by the current Squid
See http://build.squid-cache.org/job/3.HEAD-amd64-centos-6/199/changes
Changes:
[Christos Tsantilas] Fix documentation for key_extras authentication helper
parameter
--
[...truncated 7724 lines...]
Testing ../../src/StoreEntryStream.h ...Ok.
Testing
On 2014-01-31 07:35, Alex Rousskov wrote:
[I may have figured out why we could not make progress before, and we
may be finally converging on a solution. P4 at the bottom. ]
On 01/29/2014 08:51 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 30/01/2014 1:44 p.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
P1: ignore ftp_epsv off
On 01/29/2014 09:27 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 30/01/2014 2:29 p.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
Ability to run two concurrent instances using the same configuration
file does not sound like a reasonable goal/requirement to me. Has
anybody even asked for that? What was their motivation?? I know
On 2014-01-31 10:55, Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 01/29/2014 09:01 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 30/01/2014 2:06 p.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 01/29/2014 03:44 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 2014-01-30 06:55, Alex Rousskov wrote:
snip
Furthermore, I think it is a good idea to eventually add a
On 2014-01-31 11:38, Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 01/29/2014 09:27 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 30/01/2014 2:29 p.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
Ability to run two concurrent instances using the same configuration
file does not sound like a reasonable goal/requirement to me. Has
anybody even asked for
On 01/30/2014 03:35 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
P4-b: Shall we skip the arguing and go straight to ACL driven in that
format? I think it may be faster to simply write up a patch for ACLs
with a default allow all and simply allow/deny action choice than to
continue discussions around the on/off
On 31/01/2014 12:17 p.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 01/30/2014 03:35 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
P4-b: Shall we skip the arguing and go straight to ACL driven in that
format? I think it may be faster to simply write up a patch for ACLs
with a default allow all and simply allow/deny action choice
On 31/01/2014 5:35 p.m., Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 31/01/2014 12:17 p.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 01/30/2014 03:35 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
P4-b: Shall we skip the arguing and go straight to ACL driven in that
format? I think it may be faster to simply write up a patch for ACLs
with a default
See http://build.squid-cache.org/job/3.HEAD-amd64-centos-6/200/changes
Changes:
[Amos Jeffries] Merge from trunk
--
[...truncated 7727 lines...]
Testing ../../src/StoreEntryStream.h ...Ok.
Testing ../../src/StoreFileSystem.h ...Ok.
Testing
See http://build.squid-cache.org/job/3.HEAD-amd64-centos-6/201/changes
Changes:
[Amos Jeffries] Revert rev.13253 - fuba
--
[...truncated 7727 lines...]
Testing ../../src/StoreEntryStream.h ...Ok.
Testing ../../src/StoreFileSystem.h ...Ok.
Testing
17 matches
Mail list logo
