Re: [RFC] squid-3.6 unit tests

2014-08-24 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 24/08/2014 12:01 p.m., Amos Jeffries wrote: On 24/08/2014 3:59 a.m., Alex Rousskov wrote: If the proposed changes take a few months to implement, then yes, I agree, we should not wait. If it is a matter of a week or two, I suggest doing it now. This is your call though. It should be a

Re: [RFC] squid-3.6 unit tests

2014-08-23 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 23/08/2014 5:41 a.m., Alex Rousskov wrote: On 08/20/2014 09:16 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: Future versions of autoconf/automake will be auto-enabling their subdir-objects feature. This impacts Squid in a few ways, the largest being how we perform unit testing. At present our unit tests link

Re: [RFC] squid-3.6 unit tests

2014-08-23 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 08/23/2014 04:20 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: On 23/08/2014 5:41 a.m., Alex Rousskov wrote: On 08/20/2014 09:16 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: Future versions of autoconf/automake will be auto-enabling their subdir-objects feature. This impacts Squid in a few ways, the largest being how we perform

Re: [RFC] squid-3.6 unit tests

2014-08-23 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 24/08/2014 3:59 a.m., Alex Rousskov wrote: If the proposed changes take a few months to implement, then yes, I agree, we should not wait. If it is a matter of a week or two, I suggest doing it now. This is your call though. It should be a relatively quick job. I will give it a shot

Re: [RFC] squid-3.6 unit tests

2014-08-22 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 08/20/2014 09:16 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: Future versions of autoconf/automake will be auto-enabling their subdir-objects feature. This impacts Squid in a few ways, the largest being how we perform unit testing. At present our unit tests link to objects in $(top_srcdir)/src/tests/ and