Re: stupid gdb

2003-08-15 Thread Adrian Chadd
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003, Robert Collins wrote: you built with -g ? -g -ggdb. Unless, of course, the damned linker didn't link it with -g -ggdb... adrian

Re: stupid gdb

2003-08-15 Thread Adrian Chadd
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003, Adrian Chadd wrote: On Fri, Aug 15, 2003, Robert Collins wrote: you built with -g ? -g -ggdb. Unless, of course, the damned linker didn't link it with -g -ggdb... ... (gdb) frame 7 #7 0x0808483e in comm_old_write (fd=32, buf=0x82d1668 GET

Re: stupid gdb

2003-08-15 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 17:48, Adrian Chadd wrote: (gdb) print (fde_t *)fd_table[fd] No symbol fde_t in current context. (gdb) print (fde_t *)fd_table[fd] No symbol fde_t in current context. (gdb) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/source/squid/squid--HEAD--3.0$ grep fde_t src/*.h [EMAIL

Re: stupid gdb

2003-08-15 Thread Adrian Chadd
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003, Robert Collins wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/source/squid/squid--HEAD--3.0$ grep fde_t src/*.cc I think you'll have more luck with print (fde *)fd_table[fd] Yeah, I'm stupid. It worked, but having to have casts... Adrain

Re: stupid gdb

2003-08-14 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 23:56, Adrian Chadd wrote: Any ideas? I forgot how to fix this: (gdb) print fd $1 = 28 (gdb) print fd_table[28].wstate cannot subscript something of type `data variable, no debug info' (gdb) print fd_table[28].write_method cannot subscript something of type `data