Hi all,
so, there's my proxy problem I couldn't crack, even after spending 2+
days tweaking-googling-debugging. :(
The problem: my _new_ Squid installation (Ubuntu 14 LTS with Squid 3.3.8)
won't cache most pages the old Squid does (old Fedora with Squid 3.1.15).
Infos:
- Simple reverse proxy,
Hi Greg,
I use this combo to check if request is cached or no and why:
debug_options 20,9 27,9 31,9 70,9 82,9 22,9 84,9 90,9
Then in cache.log file you can search by 'YES' or 'NO' (uppercase) to
see if the content is cacheable (and cached) or not and the reason of
this decision. Hope this
Hi,
After some digging I realized that this setup works fine for HTTP traffic but
not for HTTPS. I'm using ssl_bump in intercept mode.
Is possible that for HTTPS traffic I can't split the upload / download ?
answers are welcome !!
Thanks
Josep
-Mensaje original-
De: squid-users
Amos , you are the rock !!
It worked with 3.5.1
Thank you a lot and appreciate ur help
regards
-Original Message-
From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On Behalf
Of Amos Jeffries
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 4:16 PM
To:
Am 24.02.2015 um 15:39 schrieb Ron Wheeler rwhee...@artifact-software.com:
On 24/02/2015 9:04 AM, Peter Oruba wrote:
Hello everybody,
I’d like to distinguish multiple clients that are behind NAT from Squid’s
perspective. Proxy authentication or sessions are not an option for
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 15:04 +0100, Peter Oruba wrote:
Hello everybody,
I’d like to distinguish multiple clients that are behind NAT from
Squid’s perspective. Proxy authentication or sessions are not an
option for different reasons and the idea that came up was to assign
each client a
Hi David,
I quickly tested something.
with E2Guardian I changed my header:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0
By
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101
Now I can use http://www.google.fr and http://www.youtube.com without
On 2015-02-24 19:25, zanettiza wrote:
Hi Everyone,I've searched and search but have not found an answer to my
question.I'm running CentOS 7 and Squid 3.3.4. When I insert
http_access
allow Safe_ports AFTER http_access allow authenticated_users I have
no
access to ports listed under my
By the way, I think Eliezer suggested I should file a bug report. There is in
fact one already filed here:
http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3930
Which brings me to my next question ...
Amos, is it possible to sponsor bug fixes?
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:47 PM, null
On 2015-02-25 03:44, Peter Oruba wrote:
Am 24.02.2015 um 15:39 schrieb Ron Wheeler :
On 24/02/2015 9:04 AM, Peter Oruba wrote:
Hello everybody,
I’d like to distinguish multiple clients that are behind NAT from
Squid’s perspective. Proxy authentication or sessions are not an
option for
this is not logic i use same conf in 3.4 and it worked like a charm !! even
the same hardware !!
what is the difference between 3.4 and 3.5 ? or what option in 3.4 if used
in 3.5 will make it crashed ?
i didnt fine and sense !!
--
View this message in context:
On 2015-02-25 15:11, d...@getbusi.com wrote:
By the way, I think Eliezer suggested I should file a bug report.
There is in fact one already filed here:
http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3930
Which brings me to my next question ...
Amos, is it possible to sponsor bug fixes?
Of
On 2015-02-25 05:31, Greg wrote:
Hi all,
so, there's my proxy problem I couldn't crack, even after spending
2+ days tweaking-googling-debugging. :(
The problem: my _new_ Squid installation (Ubuntu 14 LTS with Squid
3.3.8) won't cache most pages the old Squid does (old Fedora with
Squid
Hi
I am running squid on Centos 6.5
squid-3.1.10-29.el6.x86_64
when I browse to https://www.quadriserv.com from IE or Chrome via the
squid proxy, it seems to corrupt the server cert.
when i browse to the site by passing squid it works fine.
I have tried wget from the squid box works fine also
14 matches
Mail list logo
