I'll compile it and report as soon as I get a crash, luckily the
changes will have resolved the issue!
Thanks for all the hard work!
-Original Message-
From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On
Behalf Of Amos Jeffries
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 11:05 PM
T
On 21/08/2015 1:14 p.m., Nicolaas Hyatt wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I have been paying close attention to the list for a while and am just
> beginning to realize the scale of things the squid team has in front of
> them. So please understand that I'm _NOT_ begging here. I understand other
> priority is
Hey guys,
I have been paying close attention to the list for a while and am just
beginning to realize the scale of things the squid team has in front of
them. So please understand that I'm _NOT_ begging here. I understand other
priority issues take precedence, and my little issue is way on down th
On 21/08/2015 2:38 a.m., Stakres wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Maybe someone gets the info already...
> A refresh_pattern with 1 week maxi, if the same object is "visited" (coming
> from the squid cache) every day, will the object be deleted 1 week after the
> first cache action or will the squid add +1 we
Hi All,
There is an existing case in the bugzilla
(http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1913) speaking about this
request and it seems a good idea:
refresh_pattern by type mime
It would be very nice and cool to have this feature in squid to define
different min/max time per mime.
We could
Hi All,
Maybe someone gets the info already...
A refresh_pattern with 1 week maxi, if the same object is "visited" (coming
from the squid cache) every day, will the object be deleted 1 week after the
first cache action or will the squid add +1 week each time the object is
used from the cache ?
My
Hi Amos,
Any update ?
This morning, it was crazy:
*Percent used: 100.76%*
How is it possible ?
Then the squid has crashed and it's now cleaning objects.
I can understand new objects could be added faster than the squid is able to
clean older objects, but it seems there is something wrong in the
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:58:37AM +, James Harper wrote:
> >
> > We run squid 3.5.6 in a proxy server with FreeBSD 9.3.
> > Squid is the only way out, there is no transparency at all.
> > We have problems with windows update through squid.
> >
>
> Problems without doing anything with Squid,
>
> We run squid 3.5.6 in a proxy server with FreeBSD 9.3.
> Squid is the only way out, there is no transparency at all.
> We have problems with windows update through squid.
>
Problems without doing anything with Squid, or problems trying to get Squid to
actually cache windows updates?
At hom
On 20/08/2015 9:46 p.m., Peter wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 08:32:13PM +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> On 20/08/2015 7:59 p.m., Peter wrote:
>>> We run squid 3.5.6 in a proxy server with FreeBSD 9.3.
>>> Squid is the only way out, there is no transparency at all.
>>> We have problems with window
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 08:32:13PM +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 20/08/2015 7:59 p.m., Peter wrote:
> > We run squid 3.5.6 in a proxy server with FreeBSD 9.3.
> > Squid is the only way out, there is no transparency at all.
> > We have problems with windows update through squid.
>
> What "proble
Stock windows with wpad setup in dns, nothing needed to do on command line.
Well, at least thats what im have-ing here.
few xp, win 7 and 10.
same config as on the squid wiki.
and a download of windows 10 update:
http://fg.v4.download.windowsupdate.com/d/msdownload/update/software/secu/2015/
On 20/08/2015 7:59 p.m., Peter wrote:
> We run squid 3.5.6 in a proxy server with FreeBSD 9.3.
> Squid is the only way out, there is no transparency at all.
> We have problems with windows update through squid.
What "problems" ?
>
> I have looked at this:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/squid-use
We run squid 3.5.6 in a proxy server with FreeBSD 9.3.
Squid is the only way out, there is no transparency at all.
We have problems with windows update through squid.
I have looked at this:
https://www.mail-archive.com/squid-users@squid-cache.org/msg94710.html
and this:
http://wiki.squid-cache.org
On 20/08/15 12:42, Jason Haar wrote:
> So now I can:
>
> 1. ###dynamically whitelist/splice non-SNI traffic via it's existence
> (commented because it didn't work - ended up splicing everything)
>
Figured that one out: ".*" is a file - .* is a regex :-)
--
Cheers
Jason Haar
Corporate Informatio
15 matches
Mail list logo
