I reply to myself due to a bounce and I have to re-enable the membership to
list at least 3 times at month.
Maybe a problem with Yahoo.
>>> Alex: After a splice rule is applied, SslBump is over. No more rules are
>>> checked. No more loops are iterated. Squid simply "exits" the SslBump
>>>
On 09/19/2018 10:23 AM, Julian Perconti wrote:
>> Alex: After a splice rule is applied, SslBump is over. No more rules are
>> checked. No more loops are iterated. Squid simply "exits" the SslBump
>> feature (and becomes a TCP tunnel).
> What about the meaning of the ACL's at step1 when
Dear Ones, the more I use Squid the more I realize how powerful it is.
And like all powerful software it can be complex at first.
I would like to share my settings and if possible listen (read actually)
your comments and suggestions.
My goals of using squid:
- Transparent authentication of my AD
Amos,
So instead of using squidguard are you saying you should use something like
the following?
acl ads dstdomain -i "/etc/squid/squid-ads.acl"
acl adult dstdomain -i "/etc/squid/squid-adult.acl"
http_access deny ads
http_access deny adult
Do the lists need to be sorted in alphabetical
On 18/09/18 23:03, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 19/09/18 1:54 AM, neok wrote:
Thank you very much Amos for putting me in the right direction.
I successfully carried out the modifications you indicated to me.
Regarding ufdbGuard, if I understood correctly, what you recommend is to use
the
>After a splice rule is applied, SslBump is over. No more rules are
>checked. No more loops are iterated. Squid simply "exits" the SslBump
>feature (and becomes a TCP tunnel).
How is that? What about the meaning of the ACL's at step1 when splice?
e.g.:
There only these two rules for ssl_bump
Hi Amos,
thanks for your concern, as I informed you Iam looking to install Squid on
Ubuntu Linux server for Caching purpose once I kickoff i will notify you to
have your assistant.
regards
Mujtaba H,
From: squid-users on behalf of Amos
Jeffries
Sent:
Thank you for this information Amos! :) I had ufdbguard as possible replacement
in my list, your info about it beeing a fork, is the reason that I will switch
to it soon. Thanks :)
Am 19. September 2018 04:03:39 MESZ schrieb Amos Jeffries
:
>On 19/09/18 1:54 AM, neok wrote:
>> Thank you very
Am Mittwoch, den 19.09.2018, 14:38 +1200 schrieb Amos Jeffries:
> This statement is false, and very bad security practice. Squid handles
> HTTP-level access controls. Firewalls handle network-layer access
> control. Either way multiple layers of security that work together are
> better than one -
