Thank you, you've enlightened me;
I had the GlobalWhitelistDSTNet directive declared twice in two
different includes
This meant that an identical Acl declared in two different places would
contradict each other on the same addresses and generate mass warnings.
On 02/10/2023 22:01, Alex
Since Squid 6.x we have this strange behavior on acl dst
Many warnings is generated
2023/10/02 20:18:50| WARNING: You should probably remove '64.34.72.226' from
the ACL named 'GlobalWhitelistDSTNet'
2023/10/02 20:18:50| WARNING: (B) '64.34.72.226' is a subnetwork of (A)
'64.34.72.226'
Hi
Since Squid 6.x we have this strange behavior on acl dst
Many warnings is generated
2023/10/02 20:18:50| WARNING: You should probably remove '64.34.72.226'
from the ACL named 'GlobalWhitelistDSTNet'
2023/10/02 20:18:50| WARNING: (B) '64.34.72.226' is a subnetwork of (A)
'64.34.72.226'
Thank you Amos and Rafael,
Using the LinuxDnat approach worked great as well.
On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 5:18 AM Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 30/09/23 11:06, Fernando Giorgetti wrote:
> > If someone has already done that, with the client running in a different
> > machine, I would love to know how.
* Amos Jeffries :
That is false. Squid writes as much information as it can about the problem
to log, stderr, and if possible the system message log. There is nothing
else a process like Squid can do.
On 02.10.23 11:01, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Squid COULD have initialized the DB itself.
* Stuart Henderson :
> In the cache db case: it _doesn't_ know what is wrong. Perhaps it is
> indeed because the DB hasn't been initialised (though it may not have
> access permissions to create the db anyway)
r it might be the wrong path.
>, but it could equally be
> that a partition is not
On 2023-10-02, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Squid COULD have initialized the DB itself.
> That's the criticism I'm willing to allow.
> If it KNOWS what's wrong, why not "fix" it itself.
In the cache db case: it _doesn't_ know what is wrong. Perhaps it is
indeed because the DB hasn't been
* Amos Jeffries :
> On 2/10/23 10:28, Dave Blanchard wrote:
> > Squid's user friendliness could use a major overhaul.
>
> Agreed. As one of the people trying to do that for the past decade ... any
> suggestions of better wording are welcome.
But you have to admit this: I read the error message
On 2/10/23 10:28, Dave Blanchard wrote:
Squid's user friendliness could use a major overhaul.
Agreed. As one of the people trying to do that for the past decade ...
any suggestions of better wording are welcome.
I absolutely despise programs which are designed this way.
Ah, there we
Please, everyone, let's keep the discussion civil; insulting other
participants will not achieve anything good for anyone.
On the merit of the conversation: Squid is the result of the work and
passion of countless people (including myself and many other participants
to this forum) who contribute
On 02.10.23 02:07, Dave Blanchard wrote:
I'm in no mood for your bullshit.
GTFO then, go and pay for software with support.
I am just user and this is user forum, not paid support line.
Pretending as if the daemon has successfully launched but just silently failing
with no warning, then
I'm in no mood for your bullshit. Pretending as if the daemon has successfully
launched but just silently failing with no warning, then requiring me to jump
through hoops to dig up some completely meaningless error message that I have
to Google for is OBVIOUSLY NOT how it's done.
Every other
On 02.10.23 01:53, Dave Blanchard wrote:
If I have to explain correct UI design to you, then there's just no hope for
you, is there?
squit is a proxy SERVER, it does NOT have an UI.
How hard is it to print a MEANINGFUL ERROR MESSAGE?
The message is meaningful enough: the "ssl_crtd"
If I have to explain correct UI design to you, then there's just no hope for
you, is there?
How hard is it to print a MEANINGFUL ERROR MESSAGE?
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
On 02.10.23 16:09, Bud Miljkovic wrote:
Does Squid have a configuration directive to forward the processed TCP
traffic to one of the target's existing network interfaces?
No, with squid you can only configure IP address the outgoing requests will
go from.
Or to put in another way, does
On 01.10.23 16:28, Dave Blanchard wrote:
Squid's user friendliness could use a major overhaul. I absolutely despise
programs which are designed this way. It just silently fails on startup
with no obvious reason or explanation given, even if one enables debug
output to find out why. Instead
16 matches
Mail list logo
