On 16/10/21 5:13 am, Steve Hill wrote:
On 12/10/2021 09:34, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Quite sure, since I've been testing Squid-5-HEAD before it became 5.2
But to be sure, I'm deplyoing it right now.
Yep, squid-5.2 is also leaking.
:(
I'm now reasonably sure that mine is a recurrence of:
On 12/10/2021 09:34, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Quite sure, since I've been testing Squid-5-HEAD before it became 5.2
But to be sure, I'm deplyoing it right now.
Yep, squid-5.2 is also leaking.
:(
I'm now reasonably sure that mine is a recurrence of:
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> > There's squid-5.2. Does it also have this problem?
>
> Quite sure, since I've been testing Squid-5-HEAD before it became 5.2
> But to be sure, I'm deplyoing it right now.
Yep, squid-5.2 is also leaking.
Ralf Hildebrandt
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
On 08/10/2021 10:24, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I'm seeing high memory usage on Squid 5.1. Caching is disabled, so I'd
expect memory usage to be fairly low (and it was under Squid 3.5), but some
workers are growing pretty large. I'm using ICAP and SSL bump.
* Odhiambo Washington :
> > > I'm seeing high memory usage on Squid 5.1. Caching is disabled, so I'd
> > > expect memory usage to be fairly low (and it was under Squid 3.5), but
> > some
> > > workers are growing pretty large. I'm using ICAP and SSL bump.
> >
> >
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 12:24 PM Ralf Hildebrandt <
ralf.hildebra...@charite.de> wrote:
> * Steve Hill :
> >
> > I'm seeing high memory usage on Squid 5.1. Caching is disabled, so I'd
> > expect memory usage to be fairly low (and it was under Squid 3.5), but
> some
> > workers are growing pretty
* Steve Hill :
>
> I'm seeing high memory usage on Squid 5.1. Caching is disabled, so I'd
> expect memory usage to be fairly low (and it was under Squid 3.5), but some
> workers are growing pretty large. I'm using ICAP and SSL bump.
https://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5132
is somewhat
