On 30/10/2015 5:44 p.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I was convinced that there was an option to disable the host forgery
> test, which will make more sense if you will use bind and will intercept
> all DNS traffic into it.
There is host_verify_strict to set the checking to set it between
On 30/10/2015 4:09 p.m., Jester Purtteman wrote:
>
> We've got a couple thoughts going at once here, so let me condense it
> a bit. First, yes, this is coming in over a satellite and that is
> part of the bugger. Nothing like 560 ms to bring a connection to a
> halt. Part of my plan is exactly
On 29/10/2015 3:02 p.m., Jester Purtteman wrote:
> but my bigger question is: if I setup a parent
> proxy that ONLY grabs the big updates down on my big-fast-cheap
> connection, then set my little-slow-expensive-connection up to pull
> from that connection, would that have a higher chance of
> -Original Message-
> From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On
> Behalf Of Amos Jeffries
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 1:28 AM
> To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Inconsistent accessing of the cac
Hey,
I was convinced that there was an option to disable the host forgery
test, which will make more sense if you will use bind and will intercept
all DNS traffic into it.
About your idea for an upstream cache.
It's a pretty nice idea, I am pretty sure that the host forgery test can
be
> -Original Message-
> From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On
> Behalf Of Amos Jeffries
> Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 9:07 PM
> To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Inconsistent accessing of the cac
> -Original Message-
> From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On
> Behalf Of Amos Jeffries
> Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 9:07 PM
> To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Inconsistent accessing of the cac
zer Croitoru
> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 2:16 PM
> To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Inconsistent accessing of the cache, craigslist.org
> images, wacky stuff.
>
> Hey Jester,
>
> I know that installing bind would probably not be much of a
So, here is the problem: I want to cache the images on craigslist. The
headers all look thoroughly cacheable, some browsers (I'm glairing at you
Chrome) send with this thing that requests that they not be cachable, but
craigslist replies anyway and says "sure thing! Cache that sucker!" and
On 28/10/2015 2:05 p.m., Jester Purtteman wrote:
> So, here is the problem: I want to cache the images on craigslist. The
> headers all look thoroughly cacheable, some browsers (I'm glairing at you
> Chrome) send with this thing that requests that they not be cachable,
"this thing" being what
10 matches
Mail list logo
