Re: [squid-users] squid with OAuth2.0

2022-03-28 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 29/03/22 06:29, Pintér Szabolcs wrote: Hi Could I get plus information about the merging problem and the solution. The recent merge from master; failed due to an extra CI spellcheck, and C++11 syntax master started using since the branch previous update. The fixes were all trivial and

[squid-users] squid with OAuth2.0

2022-03-28 Thread Pintér Szabolcs
Hi Could I get plus information about the merging problem and the solution. We need help with this problem because we want to use this with 5useres. Thanks, Szabolcs! 2022. 03. 16. 8:43 keltezéssel, Pintér Szabolcs írta: Hi Thank you for the reply. I see the merge to the master

Re: [squid-users] squid with OAuth2.0

2022-03-16 Thread Pintér Szabolcs
Hi Thank you for the reply. I see the merge to the master failed? Could you try again the merging or is there any problem with the solution? Can I use this tree https://github.com/yadij/squid/tree/auth-bearer for a test until the merging doesn't going to be success? 2022. 03. 11. 4:31

Re: [squid-users] squid with OAuth2.0

2022-03-10 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 11/03/22 05:38, Pintér Szabolcs wrote: Hi I'm Szabolcs and I want to use your proxy with an OAuth2 solution. I think I have tou use this part of the Documentiation: https://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/BearerAuthentication But I didn't find more information about this, can I use it if

[squid-users] squid with OAuth2.0

2022-03-10 Thread Pintér Szabolcs
Hi I'm Szabolcs and I want to use your proxy with an OAuth2 solution. I think I have tou use this part of the Documentiation: https://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/BearerAuthentication But I didn't find more information about this, can I use it if i rebuild the code from there project: