rom: *squid-users on behalf
> of Eliezer Croitoru
> *Date: *Monday, May 2, 2022 at 11:59 AM
> *To: *squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org >
> *Subject: *Re: [squid-users] squid3/4 compilation error with Centos8/RH8
>
> Try to use the next SRPM:
>
> https://www.ngtech.c
@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] squid3/4 compilation error with Centos8/RH8
Try to use the next SRPM:
https://www.ngtech.co.il/repo/centos/8/SRPMS/squid-4.17-8.el8.src.rpm
Good Luck,
Eliezer Croitoru
NgTech, Tech Support
Mobile: +972-5-28704261
Email: ngtech1...@gmail.com
lzaeem
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 21:25
To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: [squid-users] squid3/4 compilation error with Centos8/RH8
Hello Team ,
I found I only was able to build squid 5.x on Centos8/RH8 - (Not able to
build 3.x or 4.x )
I was able to build squid 3.x a
Hello Team ,
I found I only was able to build squid 5.x on Centos8/RH8 – (Not able to build
3.x or 4.x )
I was able to build squid 3.x and 4.x on RH7/Centos7 .
It seems Its libssl error or so based on compilation error below (not sure if
need to upgrade or downgrade GCC)
//
On 25/01/2017 10:29 p.m., ho...@free.fr wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I really try to find a answer with google, and within
> the archives of this mailing list but couldn't find anything
> so... here I am...
>
> I need to select a squid parent based on the login of the
> user (and others
Hi everybody,
I really try to find a answer with google, and within
the archives of this mailing list but couldn't find anything
so... here I am...
I need to select a squid parent based on the login of the
user (and others things). With squid 2.7, I had a configuration
like this one :
I am not sure why you would need that many ports. if you think each port is
for each user or some other misconcept then let me tell you, you can route
all your hosts and traffic from single port only.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 4:06 PM, hitman13
wrote:
> Hi guys,
Hi guys, I'm new to linux
And I need to configure squid3 on UBUNTU SERVER 16.04
But I need to force facebook access through the proxy
And it has multi-ports, I actually need many
EX:
52.xx.6.214: 3128
52.xx.6.214: 3129
52.xx.6.214: 3130
52.xx.6.214: as much as possible
So that when you need
[mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On Behalf
Of Janis Heller
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 4:10 PM
To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: [squid-users] SQUID3 FreeRADIUS
How to use freeradius in squid3?
The wiki information I found is very outdated:
http://wiki.squid-cache.org
How to use freeradius in squid3?
The wiki information I found is very outdated:
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Authenticate/Radius
The path: "/usr/local/squid/libexec/squid_radius_auth -f /etc/radius_config“
doesn’t exist anymore on SQUID3.
All the best;
On 24/06/2016 1:19 a.m., Alejandro Cabrera Obed wrote:
> OK Eliezer, thanks a lotI will disable IPv6 and compile Squid3 again
> disabling ICMP (pinger) also because I don't need these features at all.
>
Maybe yes. Maybe no. pinger is a tricky one. It is used to record RTT
for each server
n
> Behalf Of *Alejandro Cabrera Obed
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 23, 2016 3:45 AM
> *To:* squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> *Subject:* Re: [squid-users] Squid3: icmp_sock: (97) Address family not
> supported by protocol / pinger: Unable to start ICMPv6 pinger
>
>
>
> I no
I notice that I've comnpiled squid3 with --enable-icmp but I don't need
thsi option because I don't work eith parent caches.
So I will try to reconfigure squid3 withouth the ICMP option (no pinger at
all), and I expect not to see any IPv6 warning.
Regards,
2016-06-22 21:29 GMT-03:00 Alejandro
I can't see anything about IPv6:
*cat /etc/default/networking:*
# Configuration for networking init script being run during
# the boot sequence
# Set to 'no' to skip interfaces configuration on boot
#CONFIGURE_INTERFACES=yes
# Don't configure these interfaces. Shell wildcards supported/
On Thursday 23 June 2016 at 01:22:45, Alejandro Cabrera Obed wrote:
> #ifconfig
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:53:b2:6e:88
> inet addr:10.17.133.114 Bcast:10.17.135.255 Mask:255.255.252.0
>
> loLink encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1
#ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:53:b2:6e:88
inet addr:10.17.133.114 Bcast:10.17.135.255 Mask:255.255.252.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:4488 errors:0 dropped:96 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:986
On Thursday 23 June 2016 at 01:08:33, Alejandro Cabrera Obed wrote:
> 2016/06/22 19:56:35| pinger: Unable to start ICMPv6 pinger.
>
> But after that the squid3 daemon runs OK.
What's the output from "ifconfig" on that machine?
Antony.
--
It may not seem obvious, but (6 x 5 + 5) x 5 - 55
Hi people, when I start squid3 service, I have these lines in the
/var/log/squid3/cache.log file:
2016/06/22 19:56:35 kid1| Pinger socket opened on FD 12
2016/06/22 19:56:35| pinger: Initialising ICMP pinger ...
2016/06/22 19:56:35| pinger: ICMP socket opened.
2016/06/22 19:56:35| icmp_sock:
OK Antony thank you!!
2016-06-22 18:28 GMT-03:00 Roberto Carna :
> Amos, just a last comment:
>
> My squid.conf from Squid3 has this line:
>
> #Default:
> # logfile_rotate 0
>
> So the parameter you mentiones it's just setup.
>
> Any other thing relative to log
On Wednesday 22 June 2016 at 23:28:56, Roberto Carna wrote:
> My squid.conf from Squid3 has this line:
>
> #Default:
> # logfile_rotate 0
>
> So the parameter you mentiones it's just setup.
You do realise that # at the start of a line means it is a comment and has no
effect, right?
Antony.
Amos, just a last comment:
My squid.conf from Squid3 has this line:
#Default:
# logfile_rotate 0
So the parameter you mentiones it's just setup.
Any other thing relative to log problem?
2016-06-22 11:42 GMT-03:00 Amos Jeffries :
> On 23/06/2016 1:44 a.m., Roberto Carna
OK, I'll do that.
And what about the "nocreate" option in the logrotate file for
squid3???Do I have to delete or change for waht option???
Thanks a lot again, this is my last question.
2016-06-22 14:02 GMT-03:00 Amos Jeffries :
> On 23/06/2016 4:32 a.m., Roberto Carna
On 23/06/2016 4:32 a.m., Roberto Carna wrote:
> Amos and Antony, thanks a lot for your help.
>
> At first, I'll enable IPv6 in my Debian box.
>
> And for the log problem, I couldn't understand what yoy said
> Amos...please can you detail what I have to do in order to avoid log
> rotation
On 23/06/2016 1:44 a.m., Roberto Carna wrote:
> Dear Antony, thanks for your help..below is the
> /etc/logrotate.d/squid3 filebut before I have to say I've seen in
> the web that this problem is solved by enabling IPv6, and was reported
> by a ticket
On Wednesday 22 June 2016 at 15:44:42, Roberto Carna wrote:
> Dear Antony, thanks for your help..below is the
> /etc/logrotate.d/squid3 filebut before I have to say I've seen in
> the web that this problem is solved by enabling IPv6, and was reported
> by a ticket
On Wednesday 22 June 2016 at 15:49:57, Roberto Carna wrote:
> Also I see in cache.log:
>
> pinger: Initialising ICMP pinger ...
> 2016/06/22 09:58:51| pinger: ICMP socket opened.
> 2016/06/22 09:58:51| icmp_sock: (97) Address family not supported by
> protocol 2016/06/22 09:58:51| pinger:
Also I see in cache.log:
pinger: Initialising ICMP pinger ...
2016/06/22 09:58:51| pinger: ICMP socket opened.
2016/06/22 09:58:51| icmp_sock: (97) Address family not supported by protocol
2016/06/22 09:58:51| pinger: Unable to start ICMPv6 pinger.
2016/06/22 09:58:51| Pinger exiting.
Dear Antony, thanks for your help..below is the
/etc/logrotate.d/squid3 filebut before I have to say I've seen in
the web that this problem is solved by enabling IPv6, and was reported
by a ticket (https://forum.opnsense.org/index.php?topic=879.0) ..can
this be true???
/var/log/squid3/*.log {
On Wednesday 22 June 2016 at 14:53:23, Roberto Carna wrote:
> everything was OK until the /var/log/squid3/access.log rotate to
> access.log.1. From this moment, the access.log file is not present, and the
> squid3 daemon doesn't respond...I'm not sure the cause.
Show us your log rotation script.
Dear, I've implemented a Squid3 in reverse mode, and when I test it
with some web access from my PC, everything was OK. But when I put it
in production, there are a lot of web access and everything was OK
until the /var/log/squid3/access.log rotate to access.log.1. From this
moment, the access.log
On 2015-12-30 03:26, massimo.s...@asl.bergamo.it wrote:
ciao Luigi
I ask to update the distro to squid 3.4.14, the last stable version,
released in august.
Rationale :
1) various bugs and memory leaks fixed;
2) security fix for CVE 2015 5400;
3) support for Alternate-Protocol HTTP header.
I
Greetz,
Louis
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] Namens
> Amos Jeffries
> Verzonden: donderdag 31 december 2015 10:43
> Aan: massimo.s...@asl.bergamo.it
> CC: lu...@debian.org; squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
>
tch to a new thread for it.
Two subjects in one Email, excuse me !
Many thanks, Sala
Amos Jeffries <squ...@treenet.co.nz>
31/12/2015 10:43
To
massimo.s...@asl.bergamo.it
cc
lu...@debian.org,
Subject
Re: [squid-users] squid3 / debian stable / please update to 3.4.14
On 2015-12
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] Namens
> massimo.s...@asl.bergamo.it
> Verzonden: dinsdag 29 december 2015 15:26
> Aan: lu...@debian.org
> CC: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> Onderwerp: [squid-users] squid3 / d
ciao Luigi
I ask to update the distro to squid 3.4.14, the last stable version,
released in august.
Rationale :
1) various bugs and memory leaks fixed;
2) security fix for CVE 2015 5400;
3) support for Alternate-Protocol HTTP header.
I need 3) to disable QUIC on youtube, otherwise squid3
On 24/11/2015 8:53 p.m., Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 24.11.15 15:27, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> 3.4 has about 12 years of code development difference to 2.7.
>> It is no surprise when they act different (good or bad).
>
> how do you compare this? 2.7 versions were produces in 2008 to 2010,
Hi guys.
I have face some issue with Squid Cache: Version 3.4.10.
Example this site:
www.salud.gob.mx
www.issemym.gob.mx
I cannot access this site.
Now, I have a other installation running squid 2.7.x, in that network
I can access those without any issue.
With squid 3.x I got this error in
On 24/11/2015 1:56 p.m., Beto Moreno wrote:
> Hi guys.
>
> I have face some issue with Squid Cache: Version 3.4.10.
>
> Example this site:
>
> www.salud.gob.mx
> www.issemym.gob.mx
>
> I cannot access this site.
>
> Now, I have a other installation running squid 2.7.x, in that network
> I can
I have been trying to bolster my pfsense systems and found one difficulty with
squid3. I cant figure out how to allow for support of tls 1.1 and 1.2. It
supports tls 1 of course but the new reports from qualys give a "C" for such. I
am wondering if there is a way to add support for the newer
Above all good
squid3 version 3.4.8 in the authentication parameter change for
basic_ldap_auth and I'm having trouble making queries against Windows
Active Directory, please help with this.
Thank you very much for your attention.
--
Rafael Maleta Fdez
Informatico
Direccion de Aseguramiento
On 7/11/2015 5:40 a.m., Rafael Maleta Fdez wrote:
> Above all good
> squid3 version 3.4.8 in the authentication parameter change for
> basic_ldap_auth and I'm having trouble making queries against Windows
> Active Directory, please help with this.
> Thank you very much for your attention.
>
More
The problem is that I want to authenticate the Windows domain users to
authenticate to the squid, or reports that leave me with the ips users,
so for that I need to authenticate my squid v3.4.8 on Windows Active
Directory I'm doing queries to Active Directory and give me error
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 06, Fullyrealized LLC wrote:
> I have been trying to bolster my pfsense systems and found one
> difficulty with squid3. I cant figure out how to allow for support of
> tls 1.1 and 1.2. It supports tls 1 of course but the new reports from
> qualys give a "C" for such. I am
Hi Enrico,
The Kerberos helper will authenticate only for now ( There is a now code to
get the group information, but it is not further processed). It does not do
anything to group membership like the winbind cache. Also keep in mind
Kerberos cache for about 10 hours the ticket on the
Hello together,
My Issue is the following:
Using Squid3 with Kerberos Auth works just fine but does not update the users
group membership in the winbind cache of samba as for examle ntlm_auth does.
So when using /usr/lib/squid3/negotiate_kerberos_auth for Kerberos, the auth
works, but group
, 24. Juli 2015 um 19:01 Uhr
Von: Marcus Kool marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com
An: Jens Offenbach wolle5...@gmx.de, squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Betreff: Re: Aw: Re: [squid-users] Squid3: 100 % CPU load during object caching
On 07/24/2015 01:01 PM, Jens Offenbach wrote:
@Marcus:
I am not sure what
marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com
An: Jens Offenbach wolle5...@gmx.de, squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Betreff: Re: Aw: Re: [squid-users] Squid3: 100 % CPU load during object caching
On 07/24/2015 01:01 PM, Jens Offenbach wrote:
@Marcus:
I am not sure what exactly causes the problems, but could you
, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz,
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Betreff: Re: [squid-users] Squid3: 100 % CPU load during object caching
It is not easy for me, but I have tested Squid 3.3.8 from the Ubuntu packaging
on a real physical infrastructure. I get the same results on the physical
Offenbach wolle5...@gmx.de
An: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Betreff: Re: [squid-users] Squid3: 100 % CPU load during object caching
I have made a quick test of Squid 3.3.8 on Ubuntu 15.04 and I get the same
problem: 100 % CPU usage, 500 KB/sec download rate.
Gesendet: Freitag, 24. Juli 2015 um 07
...@urlfilterdb.com
*An:* Jens Offenbach wolle5...@gmx.de, Eliezer Croitoru
elie...@ngtech.co.il, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz,
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
*Betreff:* Re: [squid-users] Squid3: 100 % CPU load during object caching
I am not sure if it is relevant, maybe it is:
I am developing
On 24/07/2015 7:49 p.m., Jens Offenbach wrote:
I have found something out... Hopefully, it helps to reproduce and solve the
issue.
I got it working with a good download rate, but very high CPU usage on Squid
3.3.8 and Squid 3.5.6. There seems to be problem with large files that get
: Marcus Kool marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com
An: Jens Offenbach wolle5...@gmx.de, squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Betreff: Re: [squid-users] Squid3: 100 % CPU load during object caching
On 07/24/2015 03:25 AM, Jens Offenbach wrote:
I have made a quick test of Squid 3.3.8 on Ubuntu 15.04 and I get the same
: Freitag, 24. Juli 2015 um 14:33 Uhr
Von: Marcus Kool marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com
An: Jens Offenbach wolle5...@gmx.de, squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Betreff: Re: [squid-users] Squid3: 100 % CPU load during object caching
On 07/24/2015 03:25 AM, Jens Offenbach wrote:
I have made a quick test
'
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Juli 2015 um 21:47 Uhr
Von: Eliezer Croitoru elie...@ngtech.co.il
An: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Betreff: Re: [squid-users] Squid3: 100 % CPU load during object caching
On 22/07/2015 21:59, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
Hey Jens,
I have tested the issue with LARGE ROCK
hope it can help you.
Gesendet:Donnerstag, 23. Juli 2015 um 13:29 Uhr
Von:Marcus Kool marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com
An:Jens Offenbach wolle5...@gmx.de, Eliezer Croitoru elie...@ngtech.co.il, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz, squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Betreff:Re: [squid-users] Squid3: 100
. Juli 2015 um 20:08 Uhr
Von: Marcus Kool marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com
An: Jens Offenbach wolle5...@gmx.de, Amos Jeffries
squ...@treenet.co.nz, Eliezer Croitoru elie...@ngtech.co.il,
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Betreff: Re: Aw: Re: [squid-users] Squid3: 100 % CPU load during object caching
On 23/07/2015 11:29 p.m., Marcus Kool wrote:
I am not sure if it is relevant, maybe it is:
I am developing an ICAP daemon and after the ICAP server sends a 100
continue
Squid sends the object to the ICAP server in small chunks of varying sizes:
4095, 5813, 1448, 4344, 1448, 1448, 2896, etc.
squ...@treenet.co.nz
Betreff: Re: [squid-users] Squid3: 100 % CPU load during object caching
On 22/07/2015 21:59, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
Hey Jens,
I have tested the issue with LARGE ROCK and not AUFS or UFS.
Using squid or not my connection to the server is about 2.5 MBps (20Mbps).
Squid
Ok. I am sorry,
Please, try this one:
http://wikisend.com/download/413650/squid.strace
Regards,
Jens
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. Juli 2015 um 16:25 Uhr
Von: Marcus Kool marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com
An: Jens Offenbach wolle5...@gmx.de
Betreff: Re: Aw: Re: [squid-users] Squid3: 100 % CPU load
' 'CXXFLAGS=-g -O2 -fPIE -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security'
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Juli 2015 um 21:47 Uhr
Von: Eliezer Croitoru elie...@ngtech.co.il
An: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Betreff: Re: [squid-users] Squid3: 100 % CPU load during object
: [squid-users] Squid3: 100 % CPU load during object caching
On 22/07/2015 12:31 a.m., Jens Offenbach wrote:
Thank you very much for your detailed explainations. We want to use Squid in
order to accelerate our automated software setup processes via Puppet.
Actually
Squid will host only a very
:28 Uhr
Von: Eliezer Croitoru elie...@ngtech.co.il
An: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Betreff: Re: [squid-users] Squid3: 100 % CPU load during object caching
Can you share the relevant squid.conf settings? Just to reproduce..
I have a dedicated testing server here which I can test the issue
: Eliezer Croitoru elie...@ngtech.co.il
An: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Betreff: Re: [squid-users] Squid3: 100 % CPU load during object caching
Can you share the relevant squid.conf settings? Just to reproduce..
I have a dedicated testing server here which I can test the issue on.
8GB archive
3428139 7 total
Can I do anything that helps to get ride of this problem?
Gesendet:Dienstag, 21. Juli 2015 um 17:37 Uhr
Von:Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz
An:Jens Offenbach wolle5...@gmx.de, squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Betreff:Re: Aw: Re: [squid-users
On 22/07/2015 21:59, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
Hey Jens,
I have tested the issue with LARGE ROCK and not AUFS or UFS.
Using squid or not my connection to the server is about 2.5 MBps (20Mbps).
Squid is sitting on an intel atom with SSD drive and on a HIT case the
download speed is more then
On 22/07/2015 12:31 a.m., Jens Offenbach wrote:
Thank you very much for your detailed explainations. We want to use Squid in
order to accelerate our automated software setup processes via Puppet.
Actually
Squid will host only a very short amount of large objects (10-20). Its
purpose
is
I am running Squid3 3.3.8 on Ubuntu 14.04. Squid3 has been installed from the
Ubuntu package repository. In my scenario, Squid has to cache big files = 1
GB. At the moment, I am getting very bad transfer rates lower that 1 MB/sec. I
have checked the connectivity using iperf3. It gives my a
On 21/07/2015 7:59 p.m., Jens Offenbach wrote:
I am running Squid3 3.3.8 on Ubuntu 14.04. Squid3 has been installed from the
Ubuntu package repository. In my scenario, Squid has to cache big files = 1
GB. At the moment, I am getting very bad transfer rates lower that 1 MB/sec.
I have
On 21/07/2015 10:59, Jens Offenbach wrote:
Is there someting wrong with my config? I have already used Squid 3.3.14. I get
the same result. Unfortunately, I was not able to build Squid 3.5.5 and 3.5.6.
What was the issue?
I am using 3.5.6 on 14.04.2 64 bit.
Eliezer
Hello,
I use Squid3 (3.1.20) with Squidguard filtering linked with an user 's
authentication on a OpenLDAP.
But, recurrently, Firefox, Thunderbird, Chrome (certainly IE) ask again
frequently the login and password in a popup.
It seem, the popup authentication appear when the browser try a
Hi Amos;
Thanks you for this complete response.
You're true, I have to upgrade my Debian :) soon !
For the conf, I have put this value in my squid.conf
auth_param ntlm keep_alive off
auth_param negotiate keep_alive off
but it seems it's not working (one user have call me) to be sure,
On 1/07/2015 8:55 p.m., Alexandre Magnat wrote:
Hello,
I use Squid3 (3.1.20)
Please upgrade.
with Squidguard filtering linked with an user 's
authentication on a OpenLDAP.
But, recurrently, Firefox, Thunderbird, Chrome (certainly IE) ask again
frequently the login and password in a
Dear all,
Our squid3 server refused to work smoothly. I am not sure if I can post and get
help here.
Thanks
Dennis
many are talented, few are driven.
Beijing City International School
北 京 乐 成 国 际 学 校
T 8610. 8771 7171
F 8610. 8771 7778
W
Hallo, Dennis,
Du meintest am 27.04.15:
Our squid3 server refused to work smoothly. I am not sure if I can
post and get help here.
Some details may be helpful.
Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
On 4/02/2015 9:20 a.m., Anton Radkevich wrote:
Yuri,
I'd like to allow or deny access for a client before establishing of
encrypted channel to proxy server using an authentication method of squid
proxy.
I think you and Yuri are talking past each other on this.
This page has what you want
Thanks for quick reply,
We don't need ssl bumping, or isn't it possible to configure by another
way, without using ssl bumping?
What's about authentication using modern hash algorithms sha256/512?
Anton
03 февр. 2015 г. 22:58 пользователь Yuri Voinov yvoi...@gmail.com
написал:
-BEGIN PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eliezer,
Squid can be cascaded with Privoxy+Tor. :)
And then - we can route users into it using ACL's ;)
Yep, not Squid itself. But with external services. ;)
04.02.2015 2:23, Eliezer Croitoru пишет:
On 03/02/2015 17:14, Anton
Hey Anton,
If you use https_port with ssl certificate it will be for one of two
options:
- interception of ssl traffic
- reverse proxy with ssl
For both cases the connection between the server and the client in the
end will be encrypted while non of them is in a forward proxy mode and
there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As forward HTTPS proxy you can use no tricks. Just preroute HTTPS
traffic to Squid and permit method CONNECT with 443 port - Squid forward
HTTPS connections by design.
I do not understand, what does authentication here. This is another
problem that
Yuri,
I'd like to allow or deny access for a client before establishing of
encrypted channel to proxy server using an authentication method of squid
proxy.
Can I setup any authentication method for https forward proxy? If yes, is
it possible to use more secure hash algorithms than old md5?
On 03/02/2015 17:14, Anton Radkevich wrote:
so just to be clear the connection flow will look like:
browser Encrypted Tunnel Server HTTP or HTTPS connection Destination
where Encrypted Tunnel is probably some form of HTTPS connection for
support with the browser PAC
Hey Anton,
Squid do not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
No. It will be encrypted to both directions.
04.02.2015 2:41, Anton Radkevich пишет:
Hey Eliezer,
Thank you for your explanation, just want to clarify.
Does it mean that if I configure squid to listen https_port on port
3129 with ssl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
04.02.2015 3:30, Anton Radkevich пишет:
Guys,
I just need an HTTPS proxy that can handle both http and https
connections for authorised clients only. I tried to configure something
like it's described here
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sure. :)
This way:
http://yvoinov.blogspot.com/2014/08/squid-tor-privoxy-transparent-dns.html
http://yvoinov.blogspot.com/2014/08/squid-tor-privoxy-transparent-dns_19.html
:)
04.02.2015 2:44, Anton Radkevich пишет:
Yuri,
Can you please share
Guys,
I just need an HTTPS proxy that can handle both http and https connections
for authorised clients only. I tried to configure something like it's
described here
http://www.mail-archive.com/squid-users@squid-cache.org/msg93592.html
Forward HTTPs proxy with digest_pw_auth for example.
But I
: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] squid3
It is not true.
Squid3 in debian is newer then 3.1 as far as I remember and if it's
not in the main repos then use the backports for it.
No, 3.1.20 is the latest in stable release (wheezy)
It is but it’s the latest
Hey Bobby,
It is not true.
Squid3 in debian is newer then 3.1 as far as I remember and if it's not
in the main repos then use the backports for it.
It is recommended that you will use a newer version of squid.
If for your environment 3.1 works fine then I guess you can say that it
works and
It is not true.
Squid3 in debian is newer then 3.1 as far as I remember and if it's
not
in the main repos then use the backports for it.
No, 3.1.20 is the latest in stable release (wheezy)
It is but it’s the latest version available through apt-get on
Debian 7 without adding backports
It is but it’s the latest version available through apt-get on Debian
7 without adding backports which I may end up doing anyway. However
I don’t think that is my problem, I think I may have missed
something in my config and was wondering if anyone had seen this
before with the usernames
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hmm.. Why so ancient Squid version?
3.1.x is legacy.
Now Amos says: Upgrade to last version. ;)
Which is 3.5.1 (wow! :))
28.01.2015 3:48, Bobby пишет:
Sorry if you’re seeing this twice… I think I sent it to the wrong
address the first
Sorry if you’re seeing this twice… I think I sent it to the wrong address the
first time.
Hello,
Ive been using squid + dansguardian (NTLM) for a few years now
and have begun setting up a new proxy with squid 3.1.20. Everything
seems to be working fine except I don’t seem to be sending the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/11/2014 1:37 a.m., Efe wrote:
I tried on different browser but it's the same. Clearing browser
cache and stopping the service made no difference either. I don't
know if Squid does change Ubuntu network settings. Any particular
place/file to
OS: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS
After i installed the squid3 package for the 1st time, i've add a list of
domains to be blocked in squid.conf:
acl myrule dstdom_regex /etc/squid3/domainblock.txt
http_access deny myrule
where domainblock.txt is
someaddress.com
blockthis.net
Which worked
93 matches
Mail list logo