; >>>> check that out, although I think that it's a problem even for
> >>>> bumped users. Even for bumped users we don't bump all sites, so
> >>>> that really could be it.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks!
> >>>>
s.squid-cache.org] On
> Behalf Of Antony Stone
> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 4:31 PM
> To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Data usage reported in log files
>
> On Friday 10 March 2017 at 22:22:59, Yuri Voinov wrote:
>
>> Of course, there is no
11.03.2017 3:43, Antony Stone пишет:
> On Friday 10 March 2017 at 22:33:44, Yuri Voinov wrote:
>
>> We have not seen the network topology and the full configuration of
>> network devices - what are we arguing about and guessing about?
> Nobody is arguing, and we are guessing so that we might be h
repancy is all
sslbump traffic.
Thank you all,
Yosi
-Original Message-
From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On
Behalf Of Antony Stone
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 4:31 PM
To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Data usage reported in
On Friday 10 March 2017 at 22:33:44, Yuri Voinov wrote:
> We have not seen the network topology and the full configuration of
> network devices - what are we arguing about and guessing about?
Nobody is arguing, and we are guessing so that we might be helpful to Yosi who
asked the question.
Inci
r bumped
>>>>>> users. Even for bumped users we don't bump all sites, so that really
>>>>>> could be it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Original Message
t it's a problem even for bumped
> >>>> users. Even for bumped users we don't bump all sites, so that really
> >>>> could be it.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>&
ump, but not for all users. I'll
>>>>> check that out, although I think that it's a problem even for bumped
>>>>> users. Even for bumped users we don't bump all sites, so that really
>>>>> could be it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>
t;>>> proxy usage in my squid logs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Data compression would give the opposite result, so that's not what
>>>>> I'm seeing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any other ideas?
>>>> Is there any traffic that is n
gt;>> users. Even for bumped users we don't bump all sites, so that really
>>> could be it.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On
> > Behalf Of Marcus Kool
> > Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 3:38 PM
> > To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> > Subject: Re: [squid-users] Data usage reported in
On 03/10/2017 01:37 PM, Marcus Kool wrote:
> Squid has no idea how many bytes go through the (HTTPS) tunnels.
Actually, Squid knows the number of raw (encrypted) TCP payload bytes
inside a tunnel and should log that.
Squid also knows and logs the number of HTTP (decrypted) bytes if the
SSL tunnel
t; Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 3:38 PM
> To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Data usage reported in log files
>
>
>
> On 10/03/17 16:27, Yosi Greenfield wrote:
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Netflow is much larger.
>>
>> I really want t
quid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On
Behalf Of Marcus Kool
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 3:38 PM
To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Data usage reported in log files
On 10/03/17 16:27, Yosi Greenfield wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> Netflow is much larger.
&
uid has no idea how many bytes go through the (HTTPS) tunnels.
Marcus
-Original Message-
From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On
Behalf Of Antony Stone
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 2:21 PM
To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-us
0, 2017 2:21 PM
To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Data usage reported in log files
On Friday 10 March 2017 at 20:14:36, Yosi Greenfield wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm analyzing my squid logs with sarg, and I see that the number of
> bytes reported as
On Friday 10 March 2017 at 20:14:36, Yosi Greenfield wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm analyzing my squid logs with sarg, and I see that the number of
> bytes reported as used by any particular user are often nowhere
> near the bytes reported by netflow and tcpdump.
Which is larger?
> I'm trying to t
17 matches
Mail list logo
