Hi.
On 18.03.2015 19:02, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> Process kid3 (SMP coordinator) is attempting to respond.
>
> Since you configured:
> snmp_port 340${process_number}
>
> and the coordinator is process number 3 I think it will be using port
> 3403 for that response.
>
>
Nobody is listening on these
On 19/03/2015 2:50 a.m., Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On 18.03.2015 16:04, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>>
>> SNMP is on the list of SMP-aware features.
>>
>> The worker receiving the SNMP request will contact other workers to
>> fetch the data for producing the SNMP response. This may take some ti
Hi.
On 18.03.2015 16:04, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
> SNMP is on the list of SMP-aware features.
>
> The worker receiving the SNMP request will contact other workers to
> fetch the data for producing the SNMP response. This may take some time.
>
Yeah, but it seems like it doesn't happen. Plus, I'm get
On 18/03/2015 9:50 p.m., Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm gathering statistics from squid using SNMP. When I use single
> process everything is fine, but when it comes to multiple workers - SNMP
> doesn't work - I got timeout when trying to read data with snmpwalk.
>
> I'm using the follow