-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16/10/2014 6:03 p.m., santosh wrote:
> Hello Amos,
>
> Thanks for your reply , is there a way to prompt for
> reauthentication if an browsing session is inactive by setting the
> TTL value ? .
You are getting yourself into trouble by confusing the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/10/2014 8:03 a.m., Mike wrote:
> On 10/14/2014 12:37 PM, Mirza Dedic wrote:
>> Just curious, what are some of you doing in your Squid
>> environment as far as URL filtering goes? It seems there are a
>> few options out there.. squidguard... dansg
Hello Amos,
Thanks for your reply , is there a way to prompt for reauthentication if an
browsing session is inactive by setting the TTL value ? .
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Unable-to-display-splash-page-on-inactive-timeout-tp4667887p4667
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16/10/2014 10:18 a.m., Linda W wrote:
> Stephen Baynes wrote:
>> On a multi CPU box - the number of Squid workers has a very big
>> effect of the throughput.
> --- Last I heard that option was only available for requests 32KB
> or smaller. Has it i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16/10/2014 9:43 a.m., Robert Watson wrote:
> Has anyone got this error when performing https proxy? I only
> receive it on a couple of https websites. How to fix? Robert
>
Just seems to be you so far.
Amos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
Stephen Baynes wrote:
On a multi CPU box - the number of Squid workers has a very big effect
of the throughput.
---
Last I heard that option was only available for requests
32KB or smaller. Has it increased?
Dunno about your use case, but looking
at my cache right now, I see 505049 files using
Has anyone got this error when performing https proxy? I only receive it on
a couple of https websites. How to fix?
Robert
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16/10/2014 7:23 a.m., Mirza Dedic wrote:
> Thanks Walter and Amos, i've taken your advice and now I got the
> blocking to partially work. I've re-organized how my ACLs are setup
> (order) and using your examples Walter to implement my ACLs.
>
> Wor
Thanks Walter and Amos, i've taken your advice and now I got the blocking to
partially work. I've re-organized how my ACLs are setup (order) and using your
examples Walter to implement my ACLs.
Working on the facebook example, I have..
acl block_domains_regex dstdom_regex -i
"/etc/squid/block-
On 10/15/2014 3:41 AM, Jacques Kruger wrote:
Hi,
I’ve implemented my fair share of squid proxies over the past couple
of years and I’ve always been able to find a solution in the mail
archive, but this time around I’m stumped. This is the first time I’ve
used squid with a fast (in our contex
Amos, can this be 'acl static_content'?
--
Thiago Farina
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Thanks - at least I can now start to plan for the future.
Regards,
Jacques
-Original Message-
From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz]
Sent: 15 October 2014 01:48 PM
To: Jacques Kruger; squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Question on throughput
-BE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16/10/2014 12:36 a.m., Jacques Kruger wrote:
> Thanks for the information.
>
> I'll do some further testing and confirm that the CPU isn't the
> bottleneck in this case. The machine is a bit long in the tooth but
> with the faster connection this c
Thanks Stephen.
If I'm correct I can only adjust the number of workers in Squid3, not in 2.7.
I'll check if I've misread the documentation and adjust it if I can.
Regards,
Jacques
-Original Message-
From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On Behalf
Of Steph
Thanks for the information.
I'll do some further testing and confirm that the CPU isn't the bottleneck in
this case. The machine is a bit long in the tooth but with the faster
connection this could easily be the issue.
As a general rule, am I correct in sticking with 2.7 for performance or is t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/10/2014 9:41 p.m., Jacques Kruger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've implemented my fair share of squid proxies over the past
> couple of years and I've always been able to find a solution in the
> mail archive, but this time around I'm stumped. This is the
On a multi CPU box - the number of Squid workers has a very big effect
of the throughput.
Stephen
On 15 October 2014 09:41, Jacques Kruger wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I’ve implemented my fair share of squid proxies over the past couple of
> years and I’ve always been able to find a solution in the mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/10/2014 8:31 p.m., santosh wrote:
> Hello Team,
>
> I have set-up a squid proxy server and have implemented the URL
> blocking and authentication through ldap successfully . Now i have
> a requirement that the squid proxy has to timeout inactive
Thank you all.
I have compiled squid 3.3.3 successfully followed what you said.
Firstly，I grab squid 3.3.3 from Cygwin.
https://onedrive.live.com/?cid=d6d15dd582a99400&id=D6D15DD582A99400%211078&v=3&ithint=photo,jpg&authkey=!AJIKkMnxNhr_KzY
Secondly，I use cygport to compile it.
https://onedr
Hi,
I've implemented my fair share of squid proxies over the past couple of years
and I've always been able to find a solution in the mail archive, but this time
around I'm stumped. This is the first time I've used squid with a fast (in our
context) internet connection, specifically a 4G connec
Hello Team,
I have set-up a squid proxy server and have implemented the URL blocking and
authentication through ldap successfully . Now i have a requirement that the
squid proxy has to timeout inactive authenticated sessions informing the
user to re-login. I followed up the below links as below
21 matches
Mail list logo
