On 10/07/2015 9:51 a.m., David Touzeau wrote:
> Hi ikna
>
> This can be done, but you need to forget the ufdbgclient and create
> yourself a new one that is able to connect to the ufdbguard server in
> order to get ufdbguard results.
> In this case, you have with your code to replace the OK statu
On 10/07/2015 7:03 a.m., Alex Wu wrote:
> It seems the option http_port cannot be put under each process ID. If using
> workers, http_port cannot bind to ports specified from http_port.
>
?? Works for me and many others.
What I dont expect to work is the *same* port line in two specific
workers
On 10/07/2015 6:43 a.m., Tory M Blue wrote:
> I had my build scripts working with the 3.5 betas, but i've switched over
> to the mainline and I'm getting a ton of invalid switches.
>
> So far I've had to comment out the following, as I'm getting errors such as
>
> config.status: executing libtool
Hi ikna
This can be done, but you need to forget the ufdbgclient and create
yourself a new one that is able to connect to the ufdbguard server in
order to get ufdbguard results.
In this case, you have with your code to replace the OK status=302
url="" sent by ufdbguard server by OK rewrite-ur
Hi Amos, Yuri
We have created a dedicated port and added a dedicated network card.
change all browsers settings of only one Citrix server to this dedicated
network card/port.
Issue is the same.
Connection are broken...
Le 08/07/2015 23:26, Amos Jeffries a écrit :
On 9/07/2015 7:01 a.m., D
OK heres the difference
http_port 192.168.10.254:3128 intercept
http_port 192.168.10.254:3129
I had to setup squid on a second port not in intercept mode and set the
WPAD file to send HTTPS requests there.
Why will the intercept port accept HTTPS CONNECT requests in 3.1 but not
3.4?
Regard
Dear all,
We recently migrated from Squid3.4.13/squidGuard to Squid3.5/ufdbGuard
With Squid3.4+squidguard, we were able to display on clients browser a
customized error page showing ONLY the original URL request on the address bar.
But, now: what we display on clients browser is:
http://10.1.1.
It seems the option http_port cannot be put under each process ID. If using
workers, http_port cannot bind to ports specified from http_port.
Alex
> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 14:56:46 +1200
> From: squ...@treenet.co.nz
> To: alex_wu2...@hotmail.com; squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [s
I had my build scripts working with the 3.5 betas, but i've switched over
to the mainline and I'm getting a ton of invalid switches.
So far I've had to comment out the following, as I'm getting errors such as
config.status: executing libtool commands
+ --enable-snmp --enable-storeio=aufs,diskd,u
Ive had Squid 3.1 running on a Debian 7 server for a couple of years
working in intercept mode for HTTP traffic and using WPAD to force HTTPS
to be CONNECT tunneled through Squid and it works fine.
Im now trying to set up a similar system for someone else using Squid
3.4 which is the version i
On 9/07/2015 10:32 p.m., Дмитрий Рукавцов wrote:
>
>
>
>>> Четверг, 9 июля 2015, 22:06 +12:00 от Amos Jeffries :
>>>
>>> On 9/07/2015 9:54 p.m., Дмитрий Рукавцов wrote:
Hello, i have a problem here :) System - freebsd 10.1, squid 3.5.5 +
kerberos (MIT), 50 users total.
Wit
>>Четверг, 9 июля 2015, 22:06 +12:00 от Amos Jeffries :
>>
>>On 9/07/2015 9:54 p.m., Дмитрий Рукавцов wrote:
>>> Hello, i have a problem here :) System - freebsd 10.1, squid 3.5.5 +
>>> kerberos (MIT), 50 users total.
>>>
>>> Without any auth my squid works fine, system is not loaded. When i
On 9/07/2015 9:54 p.m., Дмитрий Рукавцов wrote:
> Hello, i have a problem here :) System - freebsd 10.1, squid 3.5.5 +
> kerberos (MIT), 50 users total.
>
> Without any auth my squid works fine, system is not loaded. When i enable
> Kerberos auth internet slowly goes down and crushing after a w
Hello, i have a problem here :) System - freebsd 10.1, squid 3.5.5 + kerberos
(MIT), 50 users total.
Without any auth my squid works fine, system is not loaded. When i enable
Kerberos auth internet slowly goes down and crushing after a while, at logs i
see:
2015/07/09 11:47:14 kid1| WARNING:
On 08/07/2015 19:26, David Touzeau wrote:
Dear
I would like to share a strange behavior.
We have servers that stores Citrix application.
Each Citrix server run about 10 users/session
Each session execute browsers connected to squid 3.5.6 or 3.3.13.
After opening 10 tabs, browsers generates er
15 matches
Mail list logo
