Re: [squid-users] Ubiquiti: Anyone interested in instructions how to route traffic to a squid box?

Is it an EdgeRouter ? I am interested since Ubiquiti has poor documentation. Marcus On 11/20/2016 05:31 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: I have a tiny Ubiquiti edge router here and I can publish the rules for routing ports 80 and 443 and 53 into the squid\dns box. Any interest in such a guide in

[squid-users] Ubiquiti: Anyone interested in instructions how to route traffic to a squid box?

I have a tiny Ubiquiti edge router here and I can publish the rules for routing ports 80 and 443 and 53 into the squid\dns box. Any interest in such a guide in the wiki? Eliezer Eliezer Croitoru Linux System Administrator Mobile: +972-5-28704261 Email:

Re: [squid-users] caching videos over https?

I'm not about it. There is a difference between help and passengers. Who want to get a turnkey solution without doing anything. Personally, I quite simply as help to specify the direction, or to show that anything is possible in principle. The rest I do myself. If I do not - then I buy it. At

Re: [squid-users] caching videos over https?

lol …. i hope you don’t spent much time for helping people here on the mailing list for free . thanks again for your time . > On Nov 20, 2016, at 2:03 PM, Yuri Voinov wrote: > > Store-ID is not quite cached. This deduplication and this is just what > you need for dynamic

Re: [squid-users] caching videos over https?

you are correct . but video cache solution was very very simple when compared to the store id . also it support couple of websites without that much effort . what i mean here is the simplicity …..im not in the development level … i talk about the normal squid users . cheers > On Nov 20,

Re: [squid-users] caching videos over https?

And no need to invent anything. Everything has already been invented. And it is called the invention Store-ID. You take it and write on the basis of all that is needed. I do not see any problem. 20.11.2016 17:45, --Ahmad-- пишет: > hey guys . > > as long as the video cache has been opened now

Re: [squid-users] caching videos over https?

hey guys . as long as the video cache has been opened now and in past proved its strength with http other websites for video . ((lets put youtube away now .)) why don’t we see development on it to support the video contents of websites that support http like daily motion and its sisters

Re: [squid-users] remove all squid pages & errors pages footprints

On Sunday 20 Nov 2016 at 11:22, --Ahmad-- wrote: > i want to protect squid from being scanned and flagged as open proxy So, make sure it isn't an open proxy - restrict who has access, either by IP address or by authentication. If you *do* have an open proxy on the Internet, it doesn't matter

Re: [squid-users] remove all squid pages & errors pages footprints

HI amos thanks for that info . i already did as below : 1- i didn’t touch any squid files and compiled with the option u told me and added the tcp reset acl. that was fine when i open websites with error i was seeing” tcp reset “ and thats fine . but there is other stuff I’m worry about .

Re: [squid-users] caching videos over https?

thanks all you guys for your activity ;) btw, also i noticed that about videocache written on official wiki. http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/DynamicContent/YouTube > A more polished, mature and expensive! version of this is available commercially as VideoCache